--- title: "Digital Realty’s Blackstone buyout: cash, shares and development spending | Altss Blog" description: "Digital Realty’s June 2026 buyout disclosures separate cash and share consideration, acquisition accounting, development spending and issuer versus seller…" canonical: "https://altss.com/blog/digital-realty-blackstone-jv-buyout-cash-shares-capex" --- [Altss Research](https://www.linkedin.com/company/altss) 4 min read Updated Oct 22, 2026 Share # Digital Realty’s Blackstone buyout: cash, shares and development spending Digital Realty’s June 2026 buyout disclosures separate cash and share consideration, acquisition accounting, development spending and issuer versus seller equity proceeds. [Back to blog](https://altss.com/blog) Share [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=) [X](https://x.com/intent/tweet?url=&text=Digital%20Realty%E2%80%99s%20Blackstone%20buyout%3A%20cash%2C%20shares%20and%20development%20spending) Copy link Digital Realty paid approximately $1.2 billion in cash and issued 12.3 million shares to acquire Blackstone’s interests in two data-center joint ventures in June 2026. The roughly $3.5 billion consideration bought the partners’ equity interests. It was neither a measure of new construction spending nor the full accounting value brought into Digital Realty’s consolidated balance sheet. The distinction matters when assessing how a data-center owner funds expansion. Digital Realty’s June-quarter filing separates acquisition consideration, development expenditures and equity raised for the business. A subsequent sale of the acquisition shares supplied liquidity to Blackstone, without producing proceeds for Digital Realty. ## Buying the remaining interests changed consolidation [Note 2 of the June-quarter Form 10-Q](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1297996/000110465926089296/dlr-20260630x10q.htm) describes the June 30 acquisition of the remaining 64% blended partnership interests in Digital Carver Dulles 9 and Digital Carver Brickyard. Digital Realty already held the other 36%. Both ventures became wholly owned subsidiaries of its operating partnership. The filing arrives at approximately $5.2 billion of aggregate acquisition costs to allocate. Alongside the cash and shares paid for the remaining interests, that calculation includes the $494 million historical carrying value of Digital Realty’s existing stake, $726 million of assumed debt, other liabilities, an earned promote and transaction costs. The prior interest was included at carrying value, without recognizing a gain or loss on it. The $5.2 billion therefore describes the asset-acquisition accounting, rather than fresh cash paid to Blackstone. Nor should the assumed debt be added again to the reported allocation when estimating what entered consolidation. A buyer’s equity consideration and the assets and liabilities recognized on its balance sheet answer different questions. Ownership also moved ahead of stabilization. The filing expected the newly developed assets to become fully stabilized in the first halves of 2027 and 2028. Completing the buyout did not establish that every acquired project had reached its stabilized operating state. ## Development spending sits on a separate cash schedule For the six months ended June 30, Digital Realty reported $1.627 billion of cash-basis capital expenditures excluding indirect costs. Development projects accounted for $1.477 billion; the remainder covered enhancements and recurring capital expenditure. The company separately disclosed $157.1 million of capitalized indirect costs, including $72.7 million of interest. Those inclusions explain the bridge to the cash-flow statement’s $1.784 billion of improvements to real-estate investments, at the disclosure’s rounded precision. This is a half-year spending comparison, not a three-month figure or a calculation of the Blackstone purchase price. The same cash-flow statement records $2.170 billion paid for business combinations and asset acquisitions, net of cash acquired. That line covers the first half’s acquisitions collectively. Treating it as the cash portion of one transaction would discard its period and scope; adding acquisition consideration to development spending would also mix cash and noncash measures. Future development had another boundary. At June 30, the company expected $2.8 billion to $3.3 billion of capital expenditure for the remainder of 2026, including its share of joint-venture contributions and net of partner contributions. That dated expectation describes prospective funding requirements, with different inclusions from the consolidated historical cash-spending lines. ## The selling shareholder’s proceeds did not fund the issuer Digital Realty generated approximately $2.496 billion of net cash proceeds from common-stock issuance during the first half. Its ATM programme was a source of issuer funding; the filing lists uses including acquisitions, development, working capital and debt repayment, without earmarking the proceeds to this particular buyout. Blackstone’s later sale was different. The [July 1 report](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1297996/000119312526292577/d332992d8k.htm) states that Blackstone sold 12,310,249 common shares after conversion of the non-voting shares it held. Digital Realty received no proceeds from that sale. The transaction turned the seller’s share consideration into liquidity, rather than raising another pool of cash for construction. The related [Microsoft lease-and-capex case](https://altss.com/blog/microsoft-data-center-leases-capex-cash-investment) shows why a customer’s investment measure depends on financing form. Digital Realty supplies the owner-side counterpart: buying interests with shares, consolidating existing assets and funding development are separate capital decisions. For an infrastructure investor modelling future cash needs, the relevant equity inflow is cash received by the issuer; a selling holder’s liquidity belongs to the transaction history. Share this article Share ## Related articles [Image: Top 6 Private-Company Deal-Sourcing Databases Used by PE & VC Firms (2026)](https://altss.com/blog/top-6-private-company-deal-sourcing-databases-used-by-pe-and-vc-firms-2025) Private Markets 18 min read ### [Top 6 Private-Company Deal-Sourcing Databases Used by PE & VC Firms (2026)](https://altss.com/blog/top-6-private-company-deal-sourcing-databases-used-by-pe-and-vc-firms-2025) Updated for 2026: the six platforms buy-side teams actually use—PitchBook, S&P Capital IQ Pro, SourceScrub, Grata, CB Insights, and Altss—with ownership ch [Altss Research](https://www.linkedin.com/company/altss) Oct 6, 2025 [Image: A removable report face for Citadel and a separate reveal shield for HBK illustrate restatement versus later disclosure of historical holdings.](https://altss.com/blog/13f-amendments-restatement-new-holdings-citadel-hbk) Private Markets 4 min read ### [13F amendments: replacing a report or adding previously omitted holdings](https://altss.com/blog/13f-amendments-restatement-new-holdings-citadel-hbk) 13F restatements and additions need different dataset operations. Exact Citadel and HBK filings show reporting-period and entry-count boundaries. [Altss Research](https://www.linkedin.com/company/altss) Oct 15, 2026 [Image: A three-date comparison instrument separates June30 holdings, August14 filing and October15 observation,107days after the holdings date.](https://altss.com/blog/13f-october-2026-june-holdings-q3-reporting-deadline) Private Markets 6 min read ### [13F dates in October 2026: June holdings and the Q3 deadline](https://altss.com/blog/13f-october-2026-june-holdings-q3-reporting-deadline) Original Q2 filings and current SEC guidance explain holdings dates, filing dates, the Q3 deadline and what an October 13F observation can establish. [Altss Research](https://www.linkedin.com/company/altss) Oct 15, 2026 ## Canonical URL https://altss.com/blog/digital-realty-blackstone-jv-buyout-cash-shares-capex