Skip to content
4 min read
Updated

July 2026 private-fund notices: six SEC filing snapshots

July 2026 SEC fund notices compared using original filings, with first-sale dates, reported sales and shared-issuer boundaries kept separate.

Abstract pearl notice sheet with a detached cobalt first-sale tab and open offering outline on a navy field.

Coverage period: 2026-07-01 through 2026-07-31. Publication date: October 15, 2026. This historical edition describes the notices as filed; current fundraising status is not established.

Six selected original Form D submissions filed in July 2026 show why a fund-notice monitor needs more than a filing date. Four report that the first sale had yet to occur. Two report first sales earlier in the year. One has a finite $50 million offering, while the others report indefinite offering amounts. These are issuer-reported snapshots, not six independently established July fund launches.

This historical review was researched on October 15. We selected accessible, named fund notices from the SEC's Q3 index to compare sale status, offering boundaries and legal vehicles. Each identifies a pooled investment fund and is marked as a new notice rather than an amendment. The selection is purposive, not a ranking or a census of July fundraising.

Hamilton Lane: two issuers within one accession

Hamilton Lane Secondary Fund VII-A filed July 8. The submission also lists Hamilton Lane Secondary Fund VII-B as another issuer. Its reported offering amount is indefinite, amount sold is zero and first sale is yet to occur. The fund classification is Private Equity Fund.

That shared accession is an important counting boundary. An index can list both legal issuers without establishing two separate notice submissions. Preserve each issuer's identity, but deduplicate the accession before counting filings. The zero-sold snapshot does not establish whether the vehicles subsequently obtained commitments.

DLP: a finite offering with a January first sale

DLP Lending Fund filed July 9 and reports a January 15 first sale. It states a $50 million offering, $19,340,790 sold and $30,659,210 remaining. It identifies an Other Investment Fund.

The reported sold and remaining amounts reconcile exactly to $50 million. That calculation checks the fields within this notice. It does not measure how much was raised in July: the stated first sale predates the filing month, and the notice does not provide a July-only fundraising series.

Three further notices before a reported first sale

Andreessen Horowitz Fund X-B – AI Infrastructure filed July 16 as a Venture Capital Fund. Carlyle Europe Realty Fund III filed July 23 as a Luxembourg-organized Private Equity Fund. HarbourVest Credit Opportunities Fund IV filed July 24 with the Private Equity Fund classification.

All three report indefinite offering amounts, zero sold and a first sale yet to occur. Their names suggest different areas of research, but a fund name and a broad checkbox do not supply a complete investment mandate. In particular, this review retains HarbourVest's reported fund classification rather than silently replacing it with a private-credit category inferred from its name.

For an allocator or competing manager, these notices establish the appearance and stated status of specific legal vehicles. A current close, portfolio mandate or aggregate program target would require additional original evidence. None is inferred from the presence of a July filing.

Greylock: a February first sale in a July notice

Greylock Global Opportunity Fund filed July 30 as a Hedge Fund. It reports a February 1 first sale, $2.7 million sold and three investors, with an indefinite offering amount.

As with DLP, the reported amount sold is not a July-only inflow. Nor does the new-notice designation establish that the manager or fund first began operating in July. The useful monitoring fields are the exact issuer, accession, first-sale date and issuer-reported amount, with their reporting context retained.

How to use this cohort

SEC staff's Form D FAQ explains that a notice may be filed before securities are sold and defines first sale by an investor's irrevocable contractual commitment. It also distinguishes a new original notice from an amendment. Those explanations help interpret the fields; this review makes no conclusion about any issuer's filing compliance.

No aggregate capital-raised total is presented. The finite DLP offering and the indefinite offerings have different denominators; earlier first sales also prevent a defensible July fundraising-flow calculation from these snapshots alone. An Altss Form D explanation provides general context, while these six records supply the dated evidence.

The linked SEC complete submissions and original XMLs were captured with their filing and acceptance dates, issuer identities and offering fields. The legal vehicle is the record unit; a shared accession is counted once. Later amendments or issuer announcements can change a current monitoring conclusion without changing what these July notices reported.

Share this article
Share

See the allocators behind your next close.

Public records carry source-specific dates where available. No population-wide measured refresh cadence or universal verification deadline is established here. Page modified, source captured, fact observed, entity verified and aggregate measured describe different events. Check the date attached to the relevant claim; a missing verification date means unknown. Stored source history does not establish a customer-facing historical-analysis interface.