Glossary · Performance & benchmarking
Distributions to Paid-In (DPI)
Also called: distributed to paid-in · realization multiple · cash-on-cash multiple (fund)
Distributions to paid-in (DPI) is the cumulative value a fund has distributed to its limited partners divided by the capital they have paid in; it is the realised component of total value to paid-in (TVPI).
DPI measures what has actually come back. A DPI of 1.0x means LPs have received as much as they have put in so far; anything above that is realised profit. Because it counts only distributions, DPI cannot be raised by revaluing the portfolio, which is why LPs treat it as the hardest number in a fund report.
Formula
DPI
- \sum D
- cumulative distributions to LPs since inception, after carried interest; in-kind distributions at their value on the distribution date
- PIC
- paid-in capital, including capital called for fees and expenses
GIPS calls DPI the realization multiple. Recallable distributions are handled in two ways (see the worked example): recorded gross, with any re-call added to paid-in, or netted, with only the amount not re-called counted as distributed.
Calculator
Fund cash-flow calculator
Enter LP contributions and distributions with their dates and the latest reported NAV. IRR uses the XIRR convention (actual days / 365) and treats NAV as a final inflow on its date. Calculations run in your browser.
- Paid-in
- 15
- Distributions
- 12
- IRR (XIRR)
- 9.03%
- DPI
- 0.80x
- RVPI
- 0.60x
- TVPI
- 1.40x
What counts as a distribution
Distributions include exit proceeds, dividends and interest passed through to LPs, and securities distributed in kind, valued when distributed. They are measured after the GP's carried interest; amounts placed in a carry escrow are not LP distributions until released. A distribution counts whatever funded it: proceeds from a sale, a dividend recapitalization at a portfolio company, or borrowing under a fund-level NAV facility. The last two raise DPI while adding leverage, so LPs ask how a distribution was financed, not only its size. Guidance on NAV-based facilities published in 2024 by the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) recommends consent from the limited partner advisory committee (LPAC) whenever facility proceeds fund distributions.
Recallable distributions
Many limited partnership agreements (LPAs) let the GP re-call some distributions, typically to fund follow-ons or expenses within limits (see recallable distributions and recycling). Recorded gross, every distribution counts and every re-call is new paid-in capital; recorded net, the recalled amount is removed from distributions. The gross method usually gives the higher DPI, on a larger paid-in base: in the worked example 0.18x against 0.10x. It gives the lower figure only once distributions exceed paid-in capital plus the amount re-called. Neither is wrong, but mixing them across funds produces false comparisons.
DPI over a fund's life
DPI is zero or close to it during the investment period, rises through the harvest years, and equals TVPI once the fund is fully realised. DPI is measured on paid-in capital, not on commitment: a fund that has called 70% of commitments and returned 1.0x of paid-in has returned 0.7x of the LP's commitment.
How LPs use DPI
DPI feeds liquidity planning and commitment pacing, because distributions fund future capital calls. It tests whether a manager converts reported value into cash, and it weighs heavily in re-up decisions for funds old enough to have exited. An LP that sells its interest in an LP-led secondary turns its own residual value into cash, often at a discount to NAV; the fund's DPI does not change.
Worked examples
Illustrative fund in year 5 ($ millions)
LPs have paid in $90m and received $45m; NAV is $95m. DPI = 0.50x, while TVPI is 1.56x. Half of what LPs paid in has come back as cash; most of the reported value is still unrealised.
Recallable distributions, recorded gross
An LP has paid in $100m and receives a $20m distribution that the LPA makes recallable; the GP later re-calls $10m for a follow-on investment. Recorded gross, paid-in becomes $110m and distributions stay at $20m: DPI 0.18x. With NAV of $110m, TVPI is 1.18x.
The same flows, netted
Netted, only the $10m that was not re-called counts as a distribution and paid-in stays at $100m: DPI 0.10x, TVPI 1.20x. Same cash, different ratios; the convention must be stated before funds are compared.
Examples are illustrative; figures are not market data.
Not the same as
- Total Value to Paid-In (TVPI): TVPI adds remaining NAV to distributions; DPI counts only what has been distributed.
- Realization Ratio: The realization ratio is DPI divided by TVPI, the share of total value already realised. The Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) use "realization multiple" as another name for DPI itself.
- Cash-on-Cash Return: Cash-on-cash return in real estate is annual cash income divided by equity; fund DPI is cumulative distributions divided by paid-in capital.
Common mistakes
- Treating a low DPI in a young fund as poor performance; distributions follow exits.
- Counting recallable distributions gross for one fund and net for another.
- Quoting DPI on commitment rather than on paid-in capital without saying so.
- Ignoring how distributions were funded (exits, recapitalisations, NAV borrowing).
Edge cases
- In-kind distributions of listed shares are valued at distribution; the LP's eventual sale price may differ.
- In a GP-led continuation vehicle transaction, LPs that sell receive a distribution while rolling LPs do not, so the same fund produces different LP-level DPIs.
- A clawback paid by the GP increases LP distributions late in the fund's life.
Questions
Is DPI the same as cash-on-cash return?
At fund level, DPI is sometimes called the cash-on-cash multiple. It is different from the real estate cash-on-cash return, which is annual cash income divided by equity.
What does a DPI above 1.0x mean?
LPs have received more in distributions than they have paid in so far. It does not mean the fund is finished; NAV may still remain and more capital may still be called.
External standards
| Standard | Relation | Note |
|---|---|---|
| GIPS 2020 for Firms (Provision 5.A.4.e: since-inception distributions to since-inception paid-in capital (realization multiple or DPI)) | equivalent |
Sources
- Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) for Firms 2020. CFA Institute, 2020 edition; effective 1 January 2020; required for GIPS Reports with periods ending on or after 31 December 2020. Status: Current (checked 2026-10-01). 5.A.4 — supports: Composites with committed capital must present TVPI (investment multiple), DPI (realization multiple), PIC multiple and RVPI (unrealized multiple)
- GIPS Standards for Firms 2020 - Glossary (defined terms). CFA Institute, Glossary section of the 2020 edition. Status: Current (checked 2026-10-01). investment multiple (tvpi); realization multiple (dpi); unrealized multiple (rvpi); pic multiple — supports: Standard-setter definitions of the multiples
- NAV-Based Facilities: Guidance for LPs and GPs. Institutional Limited Partners Association, ILPA, Published 25 July 2024. Status: Current (checked 2026-10-01). Recommendations — supports: NAV facility proceeds used for distributions; LPAC consent recommended
Related terms
8 termsReferenced by
9 termsConcept record
- Concept ID
- ALTSS-PERF-012
- Classification
- Performance & benchmarking
- Topics
- Performance & benchmarking
- Version
- 2.0.0
- Last reviewed
- Structured data
- JSON