Asset Class

Aviation Leasing

Aviation leasing invests in aircraft assets leased to airlines, where returns depend on lease contracts, airline credit, residual values, maintenance status, and remarketing capability.

Aviation Leasing involves owning aircraft (or portfolios) and leasing them to airlines under operating leases. Allocators pursue it as an asset-backed income strategy with contractual cash flows, but true risk is a blend of airline credit, asset technology cycles, regulatory compliance, and residual value at re-lease or sale.

The decisive capability is remarketing: when an airline returns an aircraft, can the owner place it quickly, at a strong rate, with maintenance conditions that preserve value? Lease contracts and maintenance reserves matter, but operational expertise and global network often determine realized outcomes.

How allocators define aviation leasing risk drivers

  • Lessee credit quality: airline balance sheet, route exposure, government support
  • Lease terms: duration, rate factors, security deposits, return conditions
  • Residual value risk: model popularity, age profile, technology transitions
  • Maintenance status: engine cycles, records quality, lease return provisions
  • Concentration: airline, geography, aircraft type, manufacturer exposure
  • Financing structure: leverage, debt maturity, rate hedging
  • Regulatory & geopolitical risk: sanctions, airworthiness rules, repossession enforceability

Allocator framing:
“This is only ‘asset-backed’ if repossession, maintenance, and remarketing actually work.”

Where it matters most

  • income strategies seeking asset-backed yield diversification
  • periods of airline stress (credit selection and enforcement become decisive)
  • environments with rapid tech shifts (fleet transitions can impair residuals)

How it changes outcomes

Strong discipline:

  • stabilizes income via diversified lessees and strong lease protections
  • protects residual value through maintenance governance and remarketing speed
  • reduces downside via conservative leverage and liquidity planning

Weak discipline:

  • returns depend on optimistic residual value assumptions
  • maintenance gaps create large end-of-lease capex shocks
  • concentrated airline exposure creates binary default outcomes

How allocators evaluate discipline

They trust managers who:

  • show historical re-lease timelines and realized vs modeled residuals
  • provide lease-by-lease credit underwriting and monitoring
  • demonstrate maintenance reserve policy and auditing processes
  • disclose repossession playbooks and jurisdiction enforceability

What slows decision-making

  • lack of transparency on maintenance condition and records
  • unclear residual value methodology and stress testing
  • complicated SPV structures and cross-border enforcement constraints
  • financing terms that introduce refinancing cliffs

Common misconceptions

  • “Aircraft always have value.” → Value is model-specific and cycle-dependent.
  • “Security deposits solve credit risk.” → Deposits rarely cover full default and downtime.
  • “Residuals are predictable.” → They move with technology, supply, and regulation.

Key allocator questions during diligence

  • How diversified are lessees and aircraft types—and where are the maturity cliffs?
  • What happens on default—repossession timeline and cost by jurisdiction?
  • What is the downside residual scenario and how is it hedged (if at all)?
  • How are maintenance reserves audited and enforced?
  • What leverage and refinancing risks exist at the platform level?

Key Takeaways

  • Aviation leasing is contract + credit + remarketing, not just “owning planes”
  • Maintenance discipline and residual stress tests drive realized performance
  • Conservative leverage and diversification are non-negotiable in downturns