Drawdown Facility
A credit facility used to bridge timing between investments and LP funding—allowing a fund to draw capital from a lender before issuing (or completing) LP capital calls.
Allocator relevance: Impacts cash-flow timing, performance optics (especially IRR), and transparency expectations—allocators want clear limits, permitted use, and disclosure discipline.
Expanded Definition
A drawdown facility is a borrowing arrangement that allows a fund to access short-term liquidity by drawing funds from a lender to finance investments or expenses before (or while) calling capital from LPs. It is commonly used to smooth capital-call timing, reduce administrative friction, and support fast execution when deal timelines move faster than LP funding cycles.
In practice, the term is often used broadly alongside subscription-based facilities. Regardless of label, the allocator concern is consistent: how borrowing affects timing, risk, and reporting clarity. The facility can change the observed cash-flow profile—capital may be invested before LPs fund it—shifting timing and potentially affecting reported metrics.
Allocators typically look for: a clearly stated use policy, conservative limits, and transparent reporting that makes the facility’s effect on cash flows and performance visible.
How It Works in Practice
Managers establish the facility at fund formation or early in the fund life, then draw on it to:
- fund investments quickly (then repay after capital calls settle)
- bridge administrative timing (subscription processing, notice periods)
- manage short-term liquidity needs without holding excess cash
Strong practice is to treat the facility as a timing tool, not hidden leverage:
- draws are short-duration and policy-bounded
- repayment behavior is consistent
- reporting clearly separates facility effects from operating performance
Decision Authority and Governance
Drawdown facility usage is governed by fund documents and internal approval rules: who can authorize draws, maximum exposure limits, permitted uses, and repayment expectations. Oversight is typically validated through:
- periodic reporting on facility balances and utilization
- consistency with stated policy (no “scope creep”)
- clear disclosure of how the facility affects capital-call timing and performance metrics
Allocators may also evaluate whether the GP’s disclosures are consistent and whether exceptions are rare, documented, and justified.
Common Misconceptions
Drawdown facilities are always “hidden leverage.”
Facilities automatically improve performance.
If a facility exists, the GP is overly aggressive.
Key Takeaways
A drawdown facility is primarily a timing bridge between investment execution and LP funding.
It affects cash-flow timing and can influence performance optics—disclosure matters.
Allocators look for conservative limits, permitted-use clarity, and transparent reporting.