Glossary · Fund economics

Distribution Waterfall

Also called: carry waterfall · distribution waterfall structure

A distribution waterfall is the order, set in a fund's limited partnership agreement, in which investment proceeds are divided between LPs and the general partner: typically return of capital, preferred return, GP catch-up, then a carried-interest split.

Publisher: Altss LLCPublished 2025-12-29Content modified 2026-10-01

ALTSS-ECON-009

Picture proceeds poured into a row of buckets, each of which must be full before cash spills into the next. The first buckets belong to LPs: their money back, then a preferred return. The later buckets pay the GP its carried interest. The waterfall therefore decides both how much carry the GP earns and when it is paid.

Formula

Four-tier whole-fund waterfall (one contribution K, distributable proceeds D)

T1 = min(D, K); T2 = min(D − T1, P); T3 = min(D − T1 − T2, cP ÷ (k − c)); T4 = the rest

T₁: return of contributed capital, 100% to LPs (and to the GP on its own commitment)
T₂: preferred return, 100% to LPs; P = K((1 + h)^τ − 1) for a compounded rate h over τ years
T₃: GP catch-up: share k to the GP, 1 − k to LPs
T₄: carried-interest split: c to the GP, 1 − c to LPs

This is the common whole-fund form with a compounded preferred return and a catch-up. Deal-by-deal waterfalls apply the same tiers to each realised investment. Some waterfalls have no catch-up, no preferred return (common in venture), or extra tiers with a higher carry rate above a return multiple.

Calculator

Whole-fund waterfall calculator

One contribution at the start and one distribution after the holding period. Tiers: return of capital, preferred return, GP catch-up, then the carry split. Set catch-up to 0 for no catch-up. Real LPAs add fees, expenses, multiple cash flows and clawback; this shows the mechanics only.

Capital contributedTotal distributableYears heldPreferred return (%)Carried interest (%)GP catch-up share (%)Preferred return basis

Waterfall allocation by tier
Tier	LPs	GP
1. Return of capital	100	0
2. Preferred return	46.93	0
3. Catch-up	0	11.73
4. Carried-interest split	33.07	8.27
Total	180	20

GP share of total profit: 20.00%

The standard tiers

Return of capital. LPs receive distributions until they have recovered their contributions. In a whole-fund waterfall this is all capital contributed, including capital called for management fees and fund expenses; in a deal-by-deal waterfall it is the capital for the realised deal plus whatever else the limited partnership agreement (LPA) allocates to it.
Preferred return. LPs receive a return on that capital, commonly 8% a year compounded, before the GP shares.
GP catch-up. The GP receives all or most of the next distributions until it holds its carry percentage of all profit.
Carried-interest split. Further proceeds split, commonly 80% to LPs and 20% to the GP as carried interest.

The GP's own commitment normally runs through tiers 1 and 2 alongside LPs and bears no carry.

Whole-fund and deal-by-deal

The main structural choice is the pool the tiers are measured on. A European (whole-fund) waterfall returns all contributed capital and the preferred return across the fund before any carry. An American (deal-by-deal) waterfall runs the tiers on each realised investment, so carry arrives earlier. These are one distinction under two sets of names, not two separate ones. The European and American labels are also applied loosely in the market, and whole-fund waterfalls are used by US funds too (ILPA's whole-of-fund Model LPA is a Delaware-law agreement), so practitioners describe the mechanics rather than rely on the label. The Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) publishes its Model LPA in both forms: a whole-of-fund version (first released October 2019, updated July 2020) and a deal-by-deal version (July 2020). See European vs American waterfall.

Hurdle type and compounding

With a catch-up the hurdle is "soft": once it is cleared and the catch-up completes, the GP receives its carry percentage of all profit. Without one it is "hard": carry applies only above the hurdle. A compounded preferred return produces a larger hurdle than a simple one; the difference matters only when returns are near the hurdle. See hurdle rate.

Distributions that sit outside the tiers

LPAs usually provide for tax distributions to the GP to cover tax on allocated profits before carry is paid in cash (treated as advances against carry), distributions in kind valued at a stated date, returns of unused capital and temporary investment income, and amounts that LPs may have to return later (see recallable distributions and LP giveback).

Correcting the result: clawback and escrow

Whenever carry can be paid on interim results, the final cumulative result may entitle the GP to less than it received. The GP clawback requires repayment of the excess, and a carry escrow holds back part of each carry distribution as security. Both matter most in deal-by-deal waterfalls.

Worked examples

Illustrative walk through the four tiers ($ millions)

LPs contribute 100; after six years the fund has 200 to distribute; terms are an 8% compounded preferred return, a 100% catch-up and 20% carry.

Tier	Amount	To LPs	To GP
1. Return of capital	100.00	100.00	0
2. Preferred return (8% for 6 years)	58.69	58.69	0
3. Catch-up	14.67	0	14.67
4. 80/20 split	26.64	21.31	5.33
Total	200.00	180.00	20.00

The GP ends with 20% of the 100 profit.

Who receives the marginal dollar as proceeds rise

Same terms, different outcomes. Up to 158.69 every dollar goes to LPs (tiers 1 and 2). From 158.69 to 173.36 every dollar goes to the GP (the catch-up). Above 173.36 each dollar splits 80/20. At 165, for example, the GP has received 6.31, or 9.7% of the 65 profit, because the catch-up is still under way.

Examples are illustrative; figures are not market data.

Not the same as

Liquidation Preference: A liquidation preference orders proceeds among share classes when a company is sold; a fund waterfall divides fund proceeds between LPs and the GP.
Promote: A real estate promote waterfall usually raises the sponsor's share in IRR-based tiers and often has no catch-up.

Common mistakes

Listing "European vs American" and "whole-fund vs deal-by-deal" as two separate distinctions. They describe the same choice, although the labels are used loosely.
Modelling the first tier on invested capital when the LPA returns all contributed capital, including fees and expenses, first.
Reading the 80/20 split as the GP's share at every level of proceeds. Before the catch-up completes, the GP's share is lower.
Ignoring tax distributions to the GP when reconciling carry paid with carry earned.

Edge cases

Distributions in kind can clear the hurdle on paper even if LPs later sell the securities for less.
A fund that recycles proceeds may deem them distributed and re-contributed, which changes tier 1 and tier 2 balances.
Funds with several parallel vehicles usually compute the waterfall per vehicle, so investors in different vehicles can see different carry timing.

Questions

What are the tiers of a private equity waterfall?

Usually four: return of contributed capital, preferred return, GP catch-up, and a carried-interest split such as 80/20.

Is a European waterfall better for LPs?

It is more protective, because no carry is paid until all contributed capital and the preferred return are returned, so less depends on a clawback. Total carry over the fund's life can be the same.

External standards

Standard	Relation	Note
ILPA Model LPA (Whole of Fund version (Oct 2019, updated Jul 2020) and Deal-by-Deal version (Jul 2020): distribution provisions)	related	Delaware-law model agreements for a traditional buyout fund.

Sources

ILPA Model Limited Partnership Agreement (Whole of Fund and Deal-by-Deal versions). Institutional Limited Partners Association, ILPA, Whole of Fund first released October 2019, updated July 2020; Deal-by-Deal version and term sheet released 22 July 2020. Status: Current (checked 2026-10-01). Release history; distribution provisions in both versions — supports: Both whole-of-fund and deal-by-deal waterfalls are modelled; version dates
ILPA Principles 3.0: Fostering Transparency, Governance and Alignment of Interests for General and Limited Partners. Institutional Limited Partners Association, ILPA, Third edition, released 27 June 2019. Status: Current edition (no 4.0 found as of 2026-10-01) (checked 2026-10-01). pp. 10–11 (Waterfall Structure; Clawback) — supports: LP positions on waterfall structure (whole of fund described as best practice) and on clawback

7 terms

6 terms

Concept record

Concept ID: ALTSS-ECON-009
Classification: Fund economics
Topics: Fund terms & economics
Version: 2.0.0
Last reviewed: 2026-10-01
Structured data: JSON