Asset Class
Asset-Based Lending (ABL)
Asset-Based Lending (ABL) is lending secured by specific collateral pools such as receivables, inventory, equipment, or contracted cash flows. Allocators evaluate ABL through collateral quality, advance rates, monitoring rigor, and recovery execution.
ABL focuses on loans where repayment is supported by identifiable collateral rather than enterprise value. For allocators, ABL is attractive when it offers controlled downside—but only if collateral monitoring and enforcement are real.
How allocators define ABL exposure
Segmentation includes:
- Collateral type: A/R, inventory, equipment, IP, contracts
- Advance rates: how much is lent against collateral value
- Monitoring: reporting cadence, audits, borrowing base controls
- Counterparty risk: obligor concentration and payment behavior
- Legal enforceability: lien perfection, jurisdiction, repossession reality
- Servicing capability: workout, collections, asset liquidation
Allocator framing:
“Is collateral value observable, monitorable, and collectible in stress?”
Core strategies within ABL
- Receivables financing: dependent on obligor quality and dilution controls
- Inventory lending: higher volatility; strong controls required
- Equipment finance: clearer collateral, depreciation risk
- Contracted cash-flow lending: underwriting contract quality and churn
How ABL fits into allocator portfolios
Used to:
- Generate contractual income with structured downside protection
- Add diversification versus sponsor-backed direct lending
- Build niche credit sleeves with idiosyncratic return drivers
How allocators evaluate managers
Conviction increases when managers show:
- Strong borrowing base controls and audit discipline
- Conservative advance rates and haircuts
- Proven servicing and recovery execution
- Transparent collateral performance metrics (dilution, churn, roll rates)
- Limits on obligor and sector concentration
What slows allocator decision-making
Common blockers:
- Collateral that is hard to value or enforce (in practice)
- Weak monitoring systems or low audit frequency
- Overconcentration in a few obligors or industries
- Overstated recovery assumptions and liquidation timelines
Common misconceptions
- “It’s collateralized so it’s safe” → collateral can be illiquid or contested.
- “ABL is uncorrelated” → obligor concentration can create hidden correlation.
- “Advance rates are standardized” → they’re only as good as monitoring.
Key allocator questions
- How often do you audit collateral and adjust advance rates?
- What are historical recoveries by collateral type?
- How do you handle obligor disputes, dilution, and fraud risk?
- What’s the liquidation timeline in stress?
- What systems ensure borrowing base integrity?
Key Takeaways
- ABL is defined by monitoring and enforcement, not labels
- Advance rate discipline drives capital preservation
- Recovery execution is the true differentiator