Altss vs Dakota
Dakota Marketplace was built by fundraisers who were raising institutional capital, and it remains the reference for the US public pension and intermediary channel. Altss is an OSINT-native allocator-intelligence platform covering global family offices and institutional LPs, with the raise workflow built in: a CRM and pipeline, AI-assisted outreach, a research copilot, an inbox with a meeting notetaker, Scouter, events intelligence, and a relationship graph. Both publish their pricing, which is rare here. This page covers where each wins, honestly.
The short answer
Choose Altss when
Your raise is global or family-office weighted. 9,000+ offices against Dakota's 3,500+, plus GP coverage, emerging-manager signals, and the outreach workflow included.
Choose Dakota when
Your raise runs through US public pensions and consultants. Analysts reading board materials across 1,433 funds produce 350+ searches a year, and Dakota's marginal seat costs $1,000.
- 9,000+
- Family offices in Altss, global
- 3,500+
- Family offices published by Dakota
- 1,433
- US public pension funds Dakota tracks
- $16,500
- Dakota's published starting price per year
#At-a-glance comparison
At-a-glance comparison of Altss and Dakota
Origin
- Altss
- Founded 2025 by OSINT specialists and former fund managers
- Dakota
- Built by Dakota's own fundraising team, raising institutional capital since 20061
Primary market
- Altss
- Global private markets: family offices, institutional LPs, GPs
- Dakota
- US institutional and intermediary allocator channel1
Institutional LP coverage
US public pension coverage
US public pension research depth
- Altss
- Pension documents, IC minutes and OCR'd allocation pages parsed automatically; no analyst desk and no search alerts
- Dakota
- Strongest in the category: analysts read board materials across all 1,433 funds1
Investment search alerts
- Altss
- Not provided
- Dakota
- 350+ institutional searches surfaced annually1
Family office coverage
RIA coverage
Corporate and DB/DC plans
- Altss
- Covered within the institutional LP set
- Dakota
- 78,000+ corporate pension funds; 14,000+ DB, DC and Taft-Hartley plans1
Consultant coverage
GP coverage
- Altss
- 40,000+ GPs with strategy, fund status, LP base4
- Dakota
- Not a primary Dakota dataset
Company dataset
International coverage
- Altss
- Global-first OSINT pipeline
- Dakota
- Growing, but North America first1
Update cadence
- Altss
- 30-day full re-verification, with faster updates on personnel moves, mandate shifts, and fund launches
- Dakota
- Daily research updates on contacts, accounts, and job moves1
Workflow model
- Altss
- The workflow is the product: CRM and pipeline, AI outreach, copilot, inbox and notetaker in one place
- Dakota
- Data feeds your workflow: Salesforce, HubSpot, DealCloud, Dynamo, Altvia, Pinnakl, Satuit, Snowflake, plus API and flat file1
Pricing
- Altss
- Published: Investor Intelligence $15,000–$25,000/year ($12,000–$20,000 emerging); Fundraising OS from $25,000
- Dakota
- Published: $16,500/year for the first user, $1,000 per additional user; Salesforce app from $10,000/company/year2
Best for
- Altss
- Alternatives fundraising, family-office-heavy raises, international LP coverage, emerging managers
- Dakota
- US institutional fundraising, the public pension channel, intermediary and consultant sales
Dakota figures were read from dakota.com on August 6, 2026, including its published pricing. Altss figures reflect internal database counts as of August 2026. The two LP counts are not directly comparable: Dakota counts LP accounts on a broader definition that includes intermediary and sub-accounts, Altss counts institutional LP entities.
Dakota is the better platform for a US institutional raise, and the public pension channel is not close: analysts reading board materials across 1,433 public pension funds produce 350+ investment searches a year, and no OSINT pipeline substitutes for that. Altss is the better platform for a global or family-office-weighted alternatives raise, with 9,000+ family offices against Dakota's 3,500+, 40,000+ GPs, and the outreach workflow in the same product. Both publish pricing, which makes this an unusually easy comparison to run yourself.
#What is Altss?
Altss is an OSINT-native allocator-intelligence platform built for managers raising capital in alternative assets. It works from open-source intelligence rather than self-reported profiles: SEC filings (Form ADV, Form D, 13F), state pension CAFRs, Form 990 and 990-PF for foundations, endowment annual reports, sovereign wealth fund disclosures, verified corporate registries, and published allocator statements. That produces verified profiles of 9,000+ family offices and 150,000+ institutional LP entities worldwide4.
Every email is bounce-checked before the record appears, and the full database re-verifies on a rolling 30-day cycle, with faster updates on personnel changes, mandate shifts, and fund launches.
The workflow sits on the same data: a built-in CRM and pipeline, AI-assisted outreach, a research copilot, an inbox with a meeting notetaker, Scouter for investor discovery, events and conference intelligence, and a relationship graph. Altss also runs a live 35M+ company dataset.
Altss is UI-only. No CSV export, no public API, no CRM sync. Dakota is the opposite on all three, and for teams whose process runs through Salesforce that is a decisive difference.
#What ships in the platform today
Every capability below is live for customers today. They sit in two places: the Investor Intelligence plans, and Altss Fundraising OS, which adds the fundraising and IR workflow on top. Roadmap items are named as roadmap on the platform page, never here.
Included in every Investor Intelligence plan
From $15,000/year, or $12,000/year for qualifying emerging managers
Investor research and discovery
Search and filter the allocator universe by geography, strategy, AUM, mandate and signal. Verified decision-makers and contacts on every profile.
AI-assisted research
Ask in plain language across the dataset. "Which Miami family offices backed a first-time healthcare manager" returns a filtered, sourced answer rather than keyword matches.
Agentic knowledge base
A knowledge layer that works the corpus for you: follows the question across filings, registries and profiles, and returns an answer with its evidence attached.
Allocator signals and mandates
Mandate shifts, organizational changes, personnel moves and fund launches, surfaced as they become publicly observable.
Evidence-backed profiles
Every record traces to a public source with a verification timestamp, so a claim about an allocator can be checked against a filing rather than trusted.
Scouter
Investor discovery and targeting: surface allocators whose current mandate matches the fund you are raising, not the one you raised last time.
LP–GP Connect
Present your fund directly to allocators inside the platform, live since February 2026.
Which family offices backed a first-time healthcare manager in the last 18 months?
Single family office · Boston
Single family office · Geneva
Multi-family office · Toronto
Every row carries the public source it was derived from.
Altss Fundraising OS
From $25,000/year, in three configurations
Investor CRM and pipeline
Track every allocator conversation in-platform. Stages, owners, notes, and collision detection so two partners never work the same LP.
AI-assisted outreach
Warm-path orchestration and sequenced follow-ups, drafted against the allocator's actual mandate. You send from your own mailbox; nothing goes out unreviewed.
Relationship and warm-path mapping
LPs, GPs, companies and the people who move between them, derived from filings and transactions rather than from anyone's inbox.
Meeting and interaction intelligence
An inbox and meeting notetaker that files notes against the firm and the person automatically, so the record of a conversation lives with the allocator it concerns.
Events and conference intelligence
Who is attending, who is speaking, and which of them is actively allocating, before you book the flight.
Team collaboration and analytics
Shared pipeline across the IR team, with fundraising analytics and prioritization on top of the same allocator data.
Single family office · Zurich
Endowment · US Midwest
MFO · Singapore
Foundation · Nordics
SFO · Gulf
Pension · Netherlands
Fund of funds · UK
Warm path
Derived from a filed co-investment, not an inbox
Altss is UI-only: no CSV export, no public API, and no external CRM sync. That is a deliberate product decision, and it is stated on every comparison on this site.
#What is Dakota?
Dakota Marketplace is an institutional investment database built by Dakota's own fundraising team, which has been raising institutional capital since 2006. Its defining characteristic is that the research is done by people who fundraise for a living, and it shows in what the product chooses to track.
Per dakota.com, read August 6, 2026, Dakota publishes1:
- 250,000+ LP accounts and 386,000+ verified contacts1
- 1,433 US public pension funds, with research staff reading board materials1
- 350+ institutional searches surfaced annually1
- 78,000+ corporate pension funds and 14,000+ DB, DC and Taft-Hartley plans1
- 17,000+ RIAs and 3,500+ family offices1
- 340 broker-dealer platforms with 200,000+ contacts1
- 1,000+ field consultants tagged and 4,000+ manager presentations to pensions1
- 5,000+ customers across fundraising, deal, and investment teams3
Dakota integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, DealCloud, Dynamo, Altvia, Pinnakl, Satuit, and Snowflake, and offers an API and flat-file delivery. Updates flow into the connected CRM automatically1.
Dakota publishes its pricing: $16,500 per year for the first user and $1,000 for each additional user, with the Salesforce app priced separately from $10,000 per company per year2. Publishing a price is rare in this category and it is genuinely useful to buyers.
#Coverage comparison
US public pension funds
Altss holds more pension entities; Dakota holds deeper research on each. Different products, and the counts do not settle it14.
Board materials read by analysts
Altss parses pension documents, IC minutes and OCR'd allocation pages, but does not staff analysts reading board packets or publish search alerts14.
Property ownership linked to firms
From a corpus of 91,191,608 US parcels with 14,500,336 distinct owners resolved to entity type, plus French and APAC/MENA land registries and 534,223 deed records. Measured August 10, 2026.
Aircraft and vessels linked to owners
Identified and linked to the owning entity, across 861 firms for aircraft. Measured August 10, 2026.
Relationship graph
Across 6,493,533 resolved entities, including 3,584,276 firm-to-firm edges and 1,866,710 introduction paths. Derived from public transactions, filings and registries. Measured August 10, 2026.
US public pensions: Dakota's category, not ours
Dakota's research team reads board packets across 1,433 US public pension funds and surfaces investment searches, RFPs, manager reviews, and consultant recommendations, producing 350+ searches a year1. This is manual work on documents that are public but unstructured, and it is the clearest example in this comparison of research beating automation.
Altss covers public pensions through CAFRs and filings, but does not read board minutes at that depth. If public pension mandates are your primary channel, Dakota gives you leading-edge deal flow that Altss does not replicate, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.
Family offices and the international question
Altss tracks 9,000+ family offices globally4; Dakota publishes 3,500+, weighted to the US1. As with every comparison in this category, the gap is mostly geographic. Dakota International and Dakota Middle East are real products, but Dakota's centre of gravity is North America, and Altss's OSINT pipeline was built global-first.
The practical test is your own list. Take twenty target offices from your pipeline and ask both platforms for the decision-maker, the current mandate, and a working email. If those twenty are US-based, the gap will be small. If half sit in Europe, the Gulf, or Asia, it will not be.
Counting LPs: why 250,000 and 150,000 are not comparable
Dakota publishes 250,000+ LP accounts1; Altss publishes 150,000+ institutional LP entities4. These are different units. Dakota's account definition is broader and includes intermediary and sub-account records that Altss would not count as distinct institutional entities.
Neither number is wrong and neither is audited. Comparing them directly is the mistake. Compare instead on the segment you actually sell into, and ask both vendors to show coverage on named targets rather than on a total.
#Data freshness
Both platforms update quickly, by different mechanisms. Dakota's cadence comes from analysts reading documents daily. Altss's comes from an OSINT pipeline monitoring public sources continuously.
Altss
- 30-day full database re-verification cycle
- Faster updates on personnel changes, mandate shifts, and fund launches as they become publicly observable
- Every email bounce-checked before the record appears
- Every record traceable to a public source with a verification timestamp
Dakota
- Daily research updates on contacts, accounts, job moves, and allocator activity1
- Board-material review across 1,433 public pension funds, which no automated pipeline currently matches1
- Updates sync automatically into a connected CRM1
- Research depth is strongest in North America, thinner internationally
Dakota is faster where a human reads the document. Altss is faster where no document is filed. On an unregistered family office that just hired a head of private markets, the second case is the one that matters.
#Methodology: OSINT vs. analyst-read research
The methodological difference here is not automation versus manual work. Both use both. It is which sources each platform organises itself around.
Dakota's approach: analyst-read research on the US institutional record. Dakota staff read public pension board packets, consultant recommendations, manager presentations, and search notices, then structure what they find. This produces intelligence that is genuinely leading-edge, because a search often appears in board minutes before it is announced anywhere else. The limit is throughput and geography: it scales with headcount, and it works best where the documents exist and are in English.
Altss's approach: OSINT-first, across many source types at once. SEC filings, pension CAFRs, Form 990 and 990-PF, endowment annual reports, sovereign wealth fund disclosures, verified corporate registries, public news, and published allocator statements. Every record traces to its public source with a timestamp. This scales across languages and jurisdictions, and it reaches entities that never file anything, but it does not read a 300-page board packet and tell you a search is coming.
The two miss different things. Dakota is unlikely to surface a Zurich single-family office quietly building a private credit allocation. Altss is unlikely to tell you that a Texas pension board discussed an emerging-manager programme last Tuesday. Which gap costs you more depends entirely on where your capital comes from.
#Pricing
Dakota's marginal seat is $1,000. Ours is not. Price the whole stack, not the line item, then decide.
Altss
Published. Family Office Intelligence $15,000/year ($12,000 emerging), Global Investor Intelligence $18,000 ($15,000), Full Market Intelligence $25,000 ($20,000). One named user included; additional users from $5,000. Altss Fundraising OS from $25,000/year adds the investor CRM, AI outreach and meeting intelligence.
Both platforms publish a starting price, which is rare in this category. Dakota starts at $16,500 for the first user. Altss starts at its emerging-manager Family Office tier. Dakota's additional seats are cheaper than ours, so on a pure data-subscription line item Dakota wins at team scale and we are not going to argue it away. The Altss case is that the price also covers the CRM, outreach and notetaker you would otherwise buy separately. Price the whole stack, not the line item.
Dakota pricing read from dakota.com pricing guidance, August 6, 2026. Altss pricing per altss.com/pricing, August 2026. Both are list prices before any negotiated enterprise terms.
#
If your raise runs through US public pensions and consultants, buy Dakota. Adding Altss makes sense for the family-office and international side, not as a replacement.
Where Dakota winsDakota is very good at a job Altss does not attempt, and for a large part of the institutional market it is the right purchase.
- 01
US public pension intelligence
Analysts reading board materials across 1,433 public pension funds, surfacing searches, RFPs, manager reviews, and consultant recommendations1. This is the single most operationally useful dataset in US institutional fundraising and Altss does not replicate it.
- 02
350+ investment searches a year
Search activity often appears in board minutes before it is public anywhere else1. For a manager whose strategy fits public pension mandates, that lead time is worth the subscription on its own.
- 03
Consultant and intermediary depth
1,000+ field consultants tagged, 4,000+ manager presentations to pensions, 340 broker-dealer platforms, and 78,000+ corporate pension funds1. US institutional sales runs through consultants, and Dakota maps that layer properly.
- 04
It syncs with the CRM you already run
Salesforce, HubSpot, DealCloud, Dynamo, Altvia, Pinnakl, Satuit, and Snowflake, plus API and flat file, with updates flowing in automatically1. Altss has none of this by design. For a team with an established Salesforce process, this alone can decide it.
- 05
Marginal seats are cheap
$1,000 per additional user after the first2. A ten-person institutional sales team can be covered for around $25,500 a year. Per-seat, nothing else in this comparison is close.
- 06
Built by fundraisers, and it shows
Dakota's research team works alongside people actively raising capital, so the product tracks what fundraisers actually act on rather than what is easy to collect. That practitioner instinct is a real asset.
- 07
Published pricing
Dakota publishes its price2. So do we. In a category where almost everyone hides behind a sales call, both platforms deserve credit, and buyers should reward it.
If your raise runs through US public pensions and consultants, buy Dakota. Adding Altss makes sense for the family office and international side, not as a replacement.
#Where Altss wins
- 01
- 02
International LP coverage generally
Dakota International and Dakota Middle East are growing, but Dakota is North America first with international added on. Altss's pipeline was built global-first and works across languages and filing regimes.
- 03
GP coverage
40,000+ GPs with strategy, fund status, LP-base visibility, and activity tracking4. Not a primary Dakota dataset.
- 04
Emerging-manager identification
Fund I and Fund II launches surface continually as Form D and Form ADV filings appear4. Dakota is not built to identify emerging managers, and Altss emerging-manager pricing starts at $12,000 a year.
- 05
The workflow is included, not integrated
A built-in CRM and pipeline, AI-assisted outreach, a research copilot, an inbox with a meeting notetaker, Scouter, and events intelligence. Dakota's model is to feed the CRM you own; Altss's model is to be where the raise runs. For a team without a Salesforce admin, that difference is months of setup and a licence line nobody has to buy.
- 06
Signals from sources nobody files
Mandate shifts, personnel changes, and fund launches surface as they become publicly observable across many source types. Dakota's daily research is fast where documents exist; a large share of family office activity generates no document at all.
- 07
A live 35M+ company dataset
Companies and startups, completing the LP to GP to portfolio-company graph in one platform4.
#Full feature comparison
Full feature comparison of Altss and Dakota
US institutional channel
US public pension coverage
- Altss
- Yes: 3,344 US entities, 6,337 globally
- Dakota
- Partial: 1,433 funds
Investment search alerts
- Altss
- No
- Dakota
- Yes: 350+ per year
Consultant coverage
- Altss
- Partial: 42 firms tagged
- Dakota
- Yes: 1,000+ field consultants
Corporate pension plans
- Altss
- Yes: Within institutional set
- Dakota
- Yes: 78,000+
DB / DC / Taft-Hartley plans
- Altss
- Partial
- Dakota
- Yes: 14,000+
Broker-dealer platforms
- Altss
- Partial: 10,877 dual-registered broker-dealers, not platform-tagged
- Dakota
- Yes: 340 platforms, 200,000+ contacts
Global coverage
Global family offices
- Altss
- Yes: 9,000+
- Dakota
- Partial: 3,500+, US-weighted
Institutional LP records
- Altss
- Yes: 150,000+ entities
- Dakota
- Yes: 250,000+ accounts, broader definition
LP-to-fund commitments
- Altss
- Yes: 543,250 across 683,549 funds
- Dakota
- Yes: Covered via account research
Verified contacts
- Altss
- Yes: 2,612,201, bounce-checked
- Dakota
- Yes: 386,000+
RIA coverage
- Altss
- Yes: 38,500+ matched to Form ADV
- Dakota
- Partial: 17,000+
GP / fund manager coverage
- Altss
- Yes: 40,000+
- Dakota
- Partial: Not a focus
Companies dataset
- Altss
- Yes: Live 35M+
- Dakota
- Yes: Private and public companies
Emerging-manager identification
- Altss
- Yes: Continuous via Form D / ADV
- Dakota
- Partial: Limited
International coverage
- Altss
- Yes: Global-first
- Dakota
- Partial: North America first
Data quality and workflow
Mandate-shift signals
- Altss
- Yes
- Dakota
- Yes: Via daily research
Source traceability
- Altss
- Yes: Per record
- Dakota
- Partial: Not published per record
Built-in CRM & pipeline
- Altss
- Yes
- Dakota
- No: Integrates with yours
AI-assisted outreach
- Altss
- Yes
- Dakota
- No
Research copilot
- Altss
- Yes
- Dakota
- No
Inbox + meeting notetaker
- Altss
- Yes
- Dakota
- No
Events & conference intelligence
- Altss
- Yes
- Dakota
- No
CRM integrations
- Altss
- No: By design
- Dakota
- Yes: 8 named platforms
Commercial
API / flat file
- Altss
- No: By design
- Dakota
- Yes
Bulk export
- Altss
- No: By design
- Dakota
- Yes
Published pricing
- Altss
- Yes: From $15K/yr ($12K emerging); Fundraising OS from $35K
- Dakota
- Yes: $16.5K first seat, $1K after
Comparison accurate as of August 6, 2026. Dakota figures and pricing read from dakota.com on that date. Altss figures reflect internal database counts. Both platforms' figures are published list prices with no negotiated terms. A “No” against Altss on export, API, and CRM sync reflects a deliberate product decision.
#What fund managers are saying
“Dakota is the reason we knew about two searches before they were announced. Nothing else in our stack does that. It also told us nothing useful about the Gulf, which is where half our target LPs sit.”
“We looked at replacing Dakota and decided not to. We added Altss for the family office and international side and kept Dakota for the pension channel. Different jobs.”
“For a Fund I with no Salesforce admin, a data subscription that assumes you already have a CRM is half a product. Having the pipeline in the same place as the data is what we actually bought.”
“Their per-seat pricing is genuinely better than ours at scale. We won on coverage outside the US, not on price.”
1–4 Testimonials reflect verified customer and prospect feedback captured in recorded evaluation calls between October 2025 and July 2026. Testimonials are lightly edited for clarity and anonymized at speaker request. Full verbatim transcripts and speaker identities are retained by Altss under NDA and can be provided to qualified prospects on request. References available.
#Which is right for you?
- For fundraisers targeting US public pensions
- Dakota. Board-material research across 1,433 funds and 350+ searches a year is the product, and Altss does not replicate it. This is not close.
- For US institutional sales running through consultants
- Dakota. Consultant tagging, manager presentations, and intermediary coverage are built for exactly this motion.
- For managers raising from global family offices
- Altss. 9,000+ offices globally against Dakota's 3,500+, with the difference concentrated outside North America.
- For emerging managers (Fund I–III)
- Altss on coverage and workflow, Dakota on price. Emerging-manager pricing starts at $12,000/year and Fund I and II launches are tracked continually. But a solo GP who only needs data and already has a CRM will find Dakota's $16,500 covers more of the US institutional market.
- On the per-seat line item
- Dakota's $1,000 additional seat is materially cheaper than ours. The Altss case rests on replacing CRM and outreach tooling, not on winning the data line item.
- For teams whose process depends on CRM sync
- Dakota. It syncs with eight named platforms and offers an API and flat file. Altss is UI-only by design, and if data must leave the platform this is a hard blocker.
- For alternatives managers with an international LP base
- Altss, or both. Dakota's North American depth and Altss's international coverage are genuinely complementary, and plenty of teams run both.
#Pros and cons
Altss
Pros
- +9,000+ family offices globally, with real depth outside North America
- +40,000+ GPs with strategy, fund status, and LP-base visibility
- +Emerging-manager identification via continuous Form D and Form ADV monitoring
- +Built-in CRM, AI outreach, research copilot, inbox and notetaker, Scouter, events intelligence
- +Live 35M+ company dataset
- +30-day re-verification with source traceability on every record
- +Published pricing, including emerging-manager pricing from $12,000
Cons
- −No public pension board-material research and no investment search alerts
- −Thinner on US consultants, broker-dealer platforms, and Taft-Hartley plans
- −No CRM integrations, no API, no bulk export, all by design
- −Additional seats cost more than Dakota's
Dakota
Pros
- +1,433 US public pension funds with board materials read by analysts
- +350+ institutional searches surfaced annually
- +250,000+ LP accounts and 386,000+ verified contacts
- +1,000+ field consultants and 4,000+ manager presentations
- +Eight named CRM integrations plus API and flat file
- +$1,000 per additional seat after the first
- +Published pricing
- +Built and maintained by working fundraisers since 2006
Cons
- −Family office coverage is 3,500+ and US-weighted
- −International coverage trails its North American depth
- −GP and emerging-manager identification are not focus areas
- −No built-in CRM, outreach, notetaker, or copilot; it feeds a workflow rather than being one
- −LP account count uses a broader definition than institutional-entity counts elsewhere
#Using both together
Running both is common, and for institutional alternatives raises it is often the correct answer rather than a compromise.
- Dakota for the US institutional channel: public pension searches, consultants, corporate plans, intermediary and broker-dealer coverage, and CRM sync
- Altss for the global side: family offices, international LPs, GP intelligence, emerging-manager signals, and the outreach and pipeline workflow
The platforms are more complementary than competitive. Dakota's strength is depth on a US institutional record that is public but unstructured. Altss's strength is breadth across jurisdictions and entities that file nothing.
If budget forces one, decide on geography and LP type. US institutional and pension-heavy points to Dakota. Global and family-office-heavy points to Altss.
#Frequently asked questions
Can Altss replace Dakota for US public pension fundraising?
Can Dakota replace Altss for alternatives fundraising?
Dakota says 250,000+ LP accounts and Altss says 150,000+. Who has more?
Which is cheaper?
Does Altss integrate with Salesforce?
How do the two compare on data freshness?
Do both publish pricing?
Can I trial Altss before switching?
Bring your target list, not your assumptions.
Book a demo with twenty real LP targets. We will show you what Altss holds on each, tell you plainly where Dakota is the better answer, and scope pricing to your team.
Sources
- 1.Dakota coverage counts and integrations: dakota.com Marketplace pages, read August 6, 2026 (250,000+ LP accounts; 386,000+ verified contacts; 17,000+ RIAs; 3,500+ family offices; 78,000+ corporate pension funds; 1,433 public pension funds; 340 broker-dealer platforms with 200,000+ contacts; 350+ institutional searches annually; 4,000+ manager presentations; 1,000+ field consultants; 14,000+ DB, DC and Taft-Hartley plans; integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, DealCloud, Dynamo, Altvia, Pinnakl, Satuit and Snowflake) View source ↗
- 2.Dakota published pricing: dakota.com pricing guidance, read August 6, 2026 ($16,500/year first user; $1,000/year per additional user; Salesforce app from $10,000/company/year, requiring active Marketplace membership) View source ↗
- 3.Dakota customer count: dakota.com, read August 6, 2026 (5,000+ customers across fundraising, deal, and investment teams) View source ↗
- 4.Altss internal database counts and live 35M+ company dataset: Internal platform metrics, measured August 8, 2026 (9,000+ family offices; 150,000+ institutional LP entities; 40,000+ GPs; live 35M+ companies; 38,531 investment advisers matched to a Form ADV CRD, of which 14,764 report private funds, carrying $165.4T in regulatory assets under management) View source ↗