Network Mapping
Visualizing and analyzing relationship structures between people, entities, investments, and institutions to identify influence patterns and introduction pathways.
Network maps reveal warm introduction routes, decision influence patterns, and co-investor relationships—transforming cold outreach into relationship-based fundraising.
Expanded Definition
Network mapping captures: professional relationships (colleague, board member, advisor), educational connections (alma mater, program cohorts), investment relationships (co-investors, syndicate members), organizational affiliations (foundations, associations, clubs), and family connections (observable through shared surnames, addresses, estate documents).
Mapping techniques include: LinkedIn connection analysis, board membership overlap, co-investment pattern recognition, conference attendance tracking, and foundation board membership. Network value increases with: centrality (connected people provide more introduction routes), recency (active relationships stronger than historical), and relationship strength (close colleague > casual acquaintance).
Signals & Evidence
Network mapping signals:
- Professional networks: LinkedIn connections, shared employers, board memberships
- Educational networks: Shared universities, programs, graduation years, alumni events
- Investment networks: Co-investor patterns, syndicate memberships, LPAC participation
- Organizational memberships: Foundation boards, industry associations, social clubs
- Event co-attendance: Conference panels, speaking events, industry gatherings
- Geographic clustering: Shared office buildings, city ecosystems, regional networks
Decision Framework
- Pathway prioritization: Rank introduction routes by relationship strength, recency, and relevance
- Connector identification: Find individuals with high network centrality connecting you to target
- Relationship cultivation: Build relationships with well-connected connectors for future introduction needs
Common Misconceptions
"LinkedIn connections = warm intros" → Connection ≠ introduction willingness; assess relationship strength and relevance. "Any introduction works" → Quality matters; strong, relevant introducers dramatically outperform weak connections. "Networks are static" → Relationships evolve through job changes, board terms, organizational moves; update regularly.
Key Takeaways
- Network mapping identifies warm introduction pathways through professional, educational, investment, and organizational relationships
- Relationship strength (close colleague) and recency (current connection) matter more than connection existence
- Use network maps to route outreach through strongest, most relevant connectors rather than cold approach