Asset Class

Venture Debt

Venture Debt is structured lending to VC-backed companies designed to extend runway and reduce equity dilution. Allocators evaluate it through underwriting of sponsor support, covenant structure, collateral reality, and default-resolution playbooks.

Venture debt provides loans to venture-backed companies—often secured by assets, IP, or accounts—with repayments supported by future fundraising capacity and sponsor behavior.

From an allocator perspective, venture debt is not “safe credit.” It is a hybrid exposure where downside is managed through structure, controls, and sponsor dynamics.

How allocators define Venture Debt exposure

Segmentation includes:

  • Stage: early vs growth; pre-product vs scaled revenue
  • Collateral: A/R vs cash vs IP (and enforceability of each)
  • Sponsor quality: lead investors, reserves, historical support behavior
  • Structure: covenants, warrants/equity kickers, milestones
  • Portfolio construction: sector and vintage clustering risk
  • Workout execution: speed to act and legal/operational playbooks

Allocator framing:
“Is repayment underwritten by real cash flows—or by sponsor willingness to fund?”

Core strategies within Venture Debt

  • Runway extension loans: tied to next equity raise
  • Recurring-revenue lending: backed by contracted revenue quality
  • Equipment/asset-backed: clearer collateral but narrower use cases
  • Structured growth debt: heavier covenants, more downside shaping

How Venture Debt fits into allocator portfolios

Used to:

  • Access private-market yield with equity-linked upside (warrants)
  • Diversify within private credit (with distinct risk drivers)
  • Gain exposure to innovation cycles with structured downside

How allocators evaluate managers

Conviction increases when managers show:

  • Sponsor mapping and “support probability” underwriting
  • Tight covenants and early warning systems
  • Discipline on leverage and burn-rate dynamics
  • Proven recovery execution (not just low defaults in a bull cycle)
  • Transparent warrant outcomes and realized performance

What slows allocator decision-making

Common blockers:

  • Overreliance on benign fundraising markets
  • Weak clarity on collateral enforceability (especially IP)
  • High portfolio correlation to venture cycles and rates
  • Underreported restructurings and amendments

Common misconceptions

  • “VC backing guarantees repayment” → it only increases the chance of a bridge, not a guarantee.
  • “Defaults are rare” → defaults cluster when funding windows close.
  • “Warrants make it equity” → warrants help upside; they don’t fix credit losses.

Key allocator questions

  • What triggers intervention and how fast do you act?
  • How do you underwrite sponsor support probability?
  • What happens if the next round is delayed 18 months?
  • How are covenants enforced in practice?
  • What’s the realized loss history by vintage?

Key Takeaways

  • Venture debt is underwriting sponsor behavior + structure, not only the company
  • Cycle sensitivity is real; portfolio correlation must be managed
  • Strong covenants and fast intervention drive outcomes