Venture Debt
Venture Debt is structured lending to VC-backed companies designed to extend runway and reduce equity dilution. Allocators evaluate it through underwriting of sponsor support, covenant structure, collateral reality, and default-resolution playbooks.
Venture debt provides loans to venture-backed companies—often secured by assets, IP, or accounts—with repayments supported by future fundraising capacity and sponsor behavior.
From an allocator perspective, venture debt is not “safe credit.” It is a hybrid exposure where downside is managed through structure, controls, and sponsor dynamics.
How allocators define Venture Debt exposure
Segmentation includes:
- Stage: early vs growth; pre-product vs scaled revenue
- Collateral: A/R vs cash vs IP (and enforceability of each)
- Sponsor quality: lead investors, reserves, historical support behavior
- Structure: covenants, warrants/equity kickers, milestones
- Portfolio construction: sector and vintage clustering risk
- Workout execution: speed to act and legal/operational playbooks
Allocator framing:
“Is repayment underwritten by real cash flows—or by sponsor willingness to fund?”
Core strategies within Venture Debt
- Runway extension loans: tied to next equity raise
- Recurring-revenue lending: backed by contracted revenue quality
- Equipment/asset-backed: clearer collateral but narrower use cases
- Structured growth debt: heavier covenants, more downside shaping
How Venture Debt fits into allocator portfolios
Used to:
- Access private-market yield with equity-linked upside (warrants)
- Diversify within private credit (with distinct risk drivers)
- Gain exposure to innovation cycles with structured downside
How allocators evaluate managers
Conviction increases when managers show:
- Sponsor mapping and “support probability” underwriting
- Tight covenants and early warning systems
- Discipline on leverage and burn-rate dynamics
- Proven recovery execution (not just low defaults in a bull cycle)
- Transparent warrant outcomes and realized performance
What slows allocator decision-making
Common blockers:
- Overreliance on benign fundraising markets
- Weak clarity on collateral enforceability (especially IP)
- High portfolio correlation to venture cycles and rates
- Underreported restructurings and amendments
Common misconceptions
- “VC backing guarantees repayment” → it only increases the chance of a bridge, not a guarantee.
- “Defaults are rare” → defaults cluster when funding windows close.
- “Warrants make it equity” → warrants help upside; they don’t fix credit losses.
Key allocator questions
- What triggers intervention and how fast do you act?
- How do you underwrite sponsor support probability?
- What happens if the next round is delayed 18 months?
- How are covenants enforced in practice?
- What’s the realized loss history by vintage?
Key Takeaways
- Venture debt is underwriting sponsor behavior + structure, not only the company
- Cycle sensitivity is real; portfolio correlation must be managed
- Strong covenants and fast intervention drive outcomes