Asset Manager

Updated:

9F Jinke Holding Group

9F Jinke Holding Group originated in Beijing as a digital-finance conglomerate built around peer-to-peer lending and data-driven consumer credit.

9F Jinke Holding Group

9F Jinke Holding Group originated in Beijing as a digital-finance conglomerate built around peer-to-peer lending and data-driven consumer credit. The entity publicly traded on the Nasdaq beginning in 2019 under the ticker "JFU," raising over $84 million in its initial offering (per Reuters, 2019). 9F's architecture rested on retail-investor-funded loans matched to borrowers through proprietary algorithms, with its subsidiary Jiufu Financial operating one of China's largest marketplace-lending platforms. The group reported cumulative origination volumes exceeding RMB 200 billion (per the firm's Nasdaq filings, 2020). The group's investment strategy historically centered on algorithmic consumer lending, with loans typically sized under RMB 100,000 and durations under 24 months. Its secondary line was institutional funding partnerships, packaging loan portfolios for bank and trust-company purchasers. Beyond core lending, 9F incubated OneConnect Financial Technology — a SaaS platform sold to Ping An before its own NYSE listing — and held minority positions in digital-payments and wealth-management startups across Shanghai and Shenzhen. The geographic footprint spanned mainland China for loan origination and the Bay Area for engineering talent, with a Stamford office serving US investor relations. At peak, 9F employed over 1,200 professionals and reported RMB 10.4 billion in revenue (per its 2019 annual report, 2020). The 2020–2022 Chinese regulatory crackdown on online lending decimated its core business model. In September 2021, 9F announced a going-private transaction and delisted from the Nasdaq (per the firm's SEC filings, September 2021). Its subsidiary Jiufu Financial ceased new lending operations. Today, the group maintains corporate registrations in Beijing, San Mateo, Shanghai, Stamford, and San Francisco, but discloses no active deployment, AUM, or investment mandate. The structural differentiator of 9F — its integration of a mass-retail lending engine with a US-listed holding company — has been unwound. The entity endures as a post-regulatory shell, with its remaining assets likely tied up in legacy loan-recovery vehicles and illiquid minority stakes. No CEO, investment committee, or operating principal is publicly identified as of the current period, and the group has not published an investment update or public filing since the going-private transaction completed.

General information

Firm type

Asset Manager

Year founded

AUM

Undisclosed

Location

Region

Asia

Country

China

City

Beijing

Corporate office

Beijing, China

Additional offices

San Mateo, CA · Shanghai · Stamford, CT · San Francisco, CA

Sector focus

FinTech

Frequently asked questions

What was 9F Jinke's core business model, and is it still operational?

9F operated a peer-to-peer lending marketplace through its subsidiary Jiufu Financial that matched retail investors with consumer borrowers using proprietary credit-scoring algorithms. The business model depended on aggregating millions of small loans — typically under RMB 100,000 — and originating them at scale. China's 2020–2022 regulatory overhaul effectively banned the P2P lending model that 9F relied on. Jiufu Financial ceased new loan origination, and 9F has disclosed no new operational line of business since delisting from the Nasdaq in September 2021.

Why did 9F Jinke delist from the Nasdaq?

9F Jinke Holding Group completed its initial public offering in 2019, raising over $84 million (per Reuters, August 2019). Within two years, China's financial regulators imposed new caps on lending rates, stringent capital requirements, and data-privacy mandates that made the P2P marketplace model economically unworkable. The company's loan origination volumes collapsed, its share price fell below $1, and 9F announced a going-private transaction in September 2021, formally delisting thereafter (per SEC filings, 2021).

Does 9F Jinke manage any remaining client capital or investment funds?

No. Publicly available records show no active investment fund, managed account, or advisory mandate under 9F Jinke Holding Group's current structure. The group's regulated operating entities in China were wound down in the 2020–2022 regulatory restructuring. Its US-registered entities — in San Mateo and Stamford — have not filed an updated ADV, 13F, or other investment-disclosure form since the going-private transaction. Any remaining assets are presumed held in recovery vehicles for legacy loans rather than as deployable investment capital.

What was the relationship between 9F Jinke and OneConnect Financial Technology?

9F Jinke incubated OneConnect as a technology-services business providing cloud-based fintech solutions to small and mid-sized Chinese banks. 9F sold the OneConnect subsidiary to Ping An Insurance Group before its separate listing on the New York Stock Exchange in 2019. The divestiture removed OneConnect from 9F's consolidated group and represented one of its largest realized asset sales.

Who currently runs or controls 9F Jinke Holding Group?

No CEO, managing partner, or named investment principal is publicly identified for 9F Jinke Holding Group in its current form. The firm's last publicly named executive team departed following the 2021 delisting. The group's corporate registrations in Beijing, San Mateo, Shanghai, Stamford, and San Francisco remain active, but no individual is currently named as a responsible officer in available filings.

What is 9F Jinke's investment posture today compared to its peak?

At its 2019 peak, 9F ran a multi-region fintech conglomerate with over RMB 200 billion in cumulative loan originations and a dual US-China operational footprint. Today, its posture is that of a legacy entity managing residual legal structures. No new investments, fund close, co-investment vehicle, or allocation mandate has been reported since the 2021 delisting. Institutional allocators should treat the group as dormant for new-deployment purposes absent a verifiable public re-entry.

How does 9F Jinke's structure compare to other Chinese fintech platforms that went dark?

9F's trajectory mirrors several 2015–2019 US-listed Chinese fintech platforms — aggressive origination growth, a Nasdaq listing, then rapid compression under the 2020–2022 regulatory overhaul. Unlike Lufax (which pivoted to a guarantee-company model) or Qudian (which diverted into last-mile delivery), 9F opted for a full going-private transaction and has since ceased all visible commercial and investment activity. Its remaining corporate shells are a governance matter, not an active allocation opportunity.

Profile maintained by using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.

Need institutional-grade insight on asset managers?

Altss delivers:

Principals with verified direct contactsAllocation history by asset classOSINT-derived deal signals
Book a demo

Prefer a guided tour?

We’ll walk you through:

Interactive funding timelinesCustom mandate & allocation filters
Book a demo

More Beijing Asset Manager profiles