Updated:
Michiana Area Electrical Workers' Pension Plan
The plan was established through collective bargaining between the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) locals in the Michiana region and...
Michiana Area Electrical Workers' Pension Plan
The plan was established through collective bargaining between the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) locals in the Michiana region and signatory contractors of the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA). As a multiemployer defined-benefit plan, it pools contributions from multiple employers on behalf of covered electrical workers, creating a commingled trust that provides retirement income independent of any single contractor's solvency. The geographic footprint centers on South Bend, Elkhart, and the broader industrial corridor bridging the Indiana-Michigan state line, an area with a concentration of manufacturing and construction activity tied to the RV, automotive-supply, and commercial real-estate sectors. The fund's investment portfolio is overseen by the joint board of trustees, typically advised by an institutional investment consultant. Allocations follow a classic pension diversification model, with core public-market exposures across domestic and international equities, investment-grade and high-yield fixed income, and real assets including core real estate and infrastructure. Private-market sleeves — which can include private equity, private credit, and real estate funds — are generally accessed through commingled funds and fund-of-funds structures rather than direct co-investments, reflecting the governance capacity of a mid-sized union plan. The consultant relationship is the central operational lever: the board sets asset-class targets within a liability-driven framework, and the consultant sources, screens, and monitors external managers. While individual manager lineups are not publicly disclosed by the fund, plan documents typically reference partnership with a field consultant such as Segal Marco, NEPC, or a regional Midwestern advisory firm. Total assets under management and participant counts are not publicly disclosed by the fund, and the plan files limited public reports beyond what ERISA Form 5500 obligations require. In the most recently available Form 5500 filings — accessible via the Department of Labor's EFAST database — multiemployer plans in this peer set generally report assets in the low-to-mid hundreds of millions of dollars, supporting several hundred active participants and retiree beneficiaries. The plan's trustee structure is fixed by the Taft-Hartley statute, with equal representation from union and management trustees who meet quarterly to review investment performance, actuarial funding levels, and administrative operations. No known affiliated philanthropic foundation or hybrid wealth-management entity exists. The plan's structural differentiator lies in its governance model: the joint trusteeship forces consensus between labor and management fiduciaries, a dynamic that typically privileges steady, consultant-validated allocations over opportunistic or thematic tilts. This architecture makes the fund an attractive long-horizon allocator for core and core-plus strategies but a slow adopter of emerging-manager programs or niche alternatives. For GPs targeting mid-sized union pension plans in the Midwest, the entry point is almost always the field consultant retained by the board, not the trustees directly.
General information
Firm type
Pension Fund
Year founded
1972
AUM
Undisclosed
Location
Region
North America
Country
United States
City
South Bend
Corporate office
South Bend, IN, United States
Frequently asked questions
Who governs investment decisions at the plan?
Investment decisions are made by a joint board of trustees composed of an equal number of representatives from IBEW local unions and contributing NECA electrical contractors, as required under Taft-Hartley statute. The board typically retains an institutional investment consultant to recommend asset allocation and screen external managers; trustees review and approve all policy changes quarterly. Day-to-day investment operations — including manager selection and performance monitoring — are driven by the consultant relationship rather than an internal investment staff.
What investment strategies does the plan allocate to?
The fund runs a diversified multi-asset portfolio that includes domestic and international public equities, core and core-plus fixed income, real estate equity and debt, and private-market funds spanning private equity, private credit, and real assets. Private-market access is predominantly through commingled funds and fund-of-funds, consistent with governance constraints at mid-sized Taft-Hartley plans. Public allocations are benchmarked against broad market indices; private allocations are built over multi-vintage pacing plans advised by the fund's consultant.
How does the plan source managers and allocate to private funds?
The plan's investment consultant acts as the primary gatekeeper for manager sourcing, screening, and ongoing monitoring. GPs approaching the fund should typically start with whichever institutional consulting firm is retained by the board, as trustees rely on the consultant's manager research and due diligence process. Direct solicitation of trustees is generally not effective and may be restricted by plan policy.
What is the plan's relationship to the IBEW and NECA?
The plan is a separate legal trust established under collective bargaining agreements between IBEW local unions and NECA signatory contractors in the Michiana area. It is not an asset of either the union or the contractors; it operates as an independent fiduciary entity governed by ERISA. Contribution rates are negotiated through collective bargaining, and the plan's funded status is monitored by the board with actuarial support.
Does the plan invest directly or through fund-of-funds?
Based on standard practice for multiemployer plans of its size, the fund primarily accesses private markets through commingled funds and fund-of-funds rather than direct co-investments or separate accounts. Direct deals are rare in this segment due to the governance structure and the due-diligence capacity of a consultant-advised, trustee-governed plan. Any direct real-asset or co-investment activity would require explicit board authorization and extensive consultant underwriting.
Profile maintained by Altss using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.
Need institutional-grade insight on pension funds?
Altss delivers:
Prefer a guided tour?
We’ll walk you through: