Updated:
Open Custody Protocol
Open Custody Protocol builds open-source, non-custodial digital-asset infrastructure for institutions from bases in Menlo Park, Grand Cayman and Hong Kong.
Open Custody Protocol
Open Custody Protocol operates a multi-jurisdictional structure spanning Menlo Park, Grand Cayman, Hong Kong, Tortola and London. The entity focuses on non-custodial digital-asset infrastructure, building open-source smart-contract frameworks that allow institutions to hold and settle crypto assets without relying on a centralized third party. Its core innovation is a protocol-level custody model that separates asset control from balance-sheet risk — a direct response to the exchange failures of 2022. The protocol typically supports institutional workflows including multi-signature governance, programmatic settlement and on-chain policy enforcement. Its architecture is designed for integration by asset managers, family offices and financial institutions seeking to self-custody digital assets while maintaining operational and regulatory controls. The open-source nature of the codebase distinguishes it from proprietary custody software like Fireblocks or BitGo, making audibility and composability central to the deployment model. Geographic coverage spans the US, Caribbean, Asia and Europe, reflecting the distributed user base of the protocol's institutional adopters. The entity maintains a lean operational footprint consistent with a protocol-development organization rather than a regulated custodian or asset manager. Team size and total capital deployed are not publicly disclosed. No dedicated investment vehicle, family-office structure or philanthropic foundation has been identified as linked to the protocol's core development entity. Public records indicate operational activity across multiple offshore jurisdictions, which is typical for open-source crypto infrastructure projects seeking jurisdictional flexibility. What structurally separates Open Custody Protocol is its reliance on protocol-native enforcement over institutional trust. Unlike centralized custodians that hold assets on behalf of clients under a licensed trust structure, this protocol eliminates the custodian intermediary entirely. Adopters run the open-source software to interact directly with smart contracts, with settlement rights determined by on-chain credentials rather than by a corporate entity's internal ledger. This makes the architecture a form of autonomous financial infrastructure — a departure from both traditional custody and the SaaS-based crypto-custody model.
General information
Firm type
other
Year founded
—
AUM
Undisclosed
Location
Region
North America
Country
United States
City
Menlo Park
Corporate office
Menlo Park, CA, United States
Additional offices
Grand Cayman · Hong Kong · Tortola · London
Sector focus
Frequently asked questions
What exactly is Open Custody Protocol's core product?
The protocol provides an open-source smart-contract framework for non-custodial digital-asset holding and settlement. Institutions deploy the software to retain direct control of private keys rather than depositing assets with a centralized custodian. This approach replaces balance-sheet trust with on-chain enforcement, using multi-signature governance and programmable policy controls embedded in smart contracts.
How does Open Custody Protocol differ from a licensed custodian like BitGo or Fireblocks?
The key distinction is the removal of a corporate intermediary from asset control. Licensed custodians hold client assets under trust charters and operate proprietary software stacks. Open Custody Protocol offers an open-source protocol layer that users run directly, interacting with smart contracts rather than a company's internal ledger. This means no single entity holds or can rehypothecate the assets, and all custody operations are auditable on-chain.
Why does Open Custody Protocol maintain entities in multiple offshore jurisdictions?
Multi-jurisdictional structuring is common among open-source crypto infrastructure projects and reflects operational and legal flexibility rather than a conventional office footprint. Locations such as the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands offer established frameworks for digital-asset operations, while Hong Kong and London provide access to institutional markets in Asia and Europe.
Is Open Custody Protocol a family office or does it manage outside capital?
There is no public evidence that Open Custody Protocol functions as a family office or manages external investment capital. Public records and available documentation describe a protocol-development entity focused on building and maintaining open-source custody infrastructure for institutional adopters, not an asset-management firm.
Who maintains the Open Custody Protocol codebase and governs protocol upgrades?
The specific governance structure is not publicly detailed, but open-source crypto protocols of this type typically rely on a core development entity combined with community or token-based governance. The codebase is publicly available for audit and contribution, with protocol upgrades likely managed through an established multi-signature or DAO structure to preserve decentralization.
Profile maintained by Altss using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.
Need institutional-grade insight on investors?
Altss delivers:
Prefer a guided tour?
We’ll walk you through: