Pension Fund

Updated:

Painters & Allied Trades District Council #35

The District Council #35 pension plan covers active and retired painters and allied trades workers in greater Boston. Public available records suggest the fund...

Painters & Allied Trades District Council #35 logo

Painters & Allied Trades District Council #35

The District Council #35 pension plan covers active and retired painters and allied trades workers in greater Boston. Public available records suggest the fund has been operating for decades, its assets built from collectively bargained employer contributions. While the plan's precise size and board composition remain undisclosed in readily accessible filings, it follows the defined-benefit model common to building-trades unions. Unlike most Taft-Hartley plans, which deploy capital across a diversified menu of equities, fixed income, real estate, and buyout funds, Council #35 tilts heavily toward secondaries. Past portfolio disclosures show the plan buying positions in existing private equity partnerships via intermediaries and secondary specialists. This strategy gives the fund shorter-duration exposure than primary commitments, reduced J-curve drag, and a narrower manager roster — features that matter to a mid-sized plan without a large internal investment staff. The geographic focus centers on North American middle-market buyout and growth equity funds, with some exposure to venture portfolios. In recent years, the plan's trustees have considered allocation shifts to respond to denominator-effect pressures, but the secondary-heavy posture has remained deliberate. The fund does not operate a co-investment program or direct-deal sourcing capability. Public meeting minutes from the board's consultants indicate the plan periodically reviews its manager lineup and may rebalance into infrastructure or private credit as market conditions shift. The plan does not maintain a separate foundation or venture arm. Structurally, the plan's differentiator is its concentration risk deliberately taken. Most pension funds treat secondaries as a tactical sleeve; Council #35 appears to treat it as the core private-markets engine. This architecture replaces fund-of-funds layering with direct secondary purchases, creating a cost structure and vintage diversification profile uncommon among building-trades plans. The union's decision-making sits with a board of trustees split evenly between labor and management representatives, per Taft-Hartley rules, with investment consultants guiding manager selection.

Website
dc35.org

General information

Firm type

Pension Fund

Year founded

AUM

Undisclosed

Location

Region

North America

Country

United States

City

Roslindale

Corporate office

Roslindale, MA, United States

Sector focus

Secondaries & Special Situations

Frequently asked questions

Who oversees investment decisions at Painters & Allied Trades District Council #35?

Investment decisions rest with a board of trustees composed equally of union and employer representatives, as required under Taft-Hartley plan governance. The board engages outside investment consultants to recommend manager hires, monitor performance, and advise on asset allocation. Individual trustee names are not consistently public, though board leadership typically includes the union's business manager and signatory contractor representatives.

Why does a Taft-Hartley plan concentrate so heavily in secondaries?

Public meeting minutes and consultant reports indicate the concentration reflects a deliberate liquidity and pacing choice. Buying secondhand positions in existing private equity funds shortens the J-curve, provides faster distributions, and allows the plan to adjust vintage-year exposure without locking into new 10-year primary commitments. For a mid-sized plan without a deep investment staff, the strategy simplifies manager oversight while maintaining private-market return potential.

Does District Council #35 invest directly in companies or only through funds?

The plan invests almost exclusively through fund commitments, primarily via secondary purchases. There is no evidence of a direct co-investment program, separate managed account, or direct real-asset platform. The secondary focus means underlying exposure is diversified across many general partners, but the plan itself writes checks to secondary intermediaries and secondary-focused funds rather than to companies.

What investment stages does the plan's secondary portfolio cover?

Public disclosures suggest the secondary portfolio spans middle-market North American buyout and growth equity funds, with incidental venture exposure acquired through diversified portfolios. The plan does not appear to target early-stage venture or large-cap mega-funds in size. The preponderance of secondary activity has been in traditional private equity strategies rather than real estate or infrastructure secondaries.

Does the plan maintain a separate philanthropic foundation or operating arm?

No separate foundation, philanthropic trust, or operating entity is linked to the plan. The union itself may maintain apprenticeship training funds and member assistance programs, but those are separate legal entities funded through different collectively bargained contributions and are not investment vehicles of the pension fund.

Profile maintained by using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.

Need institutional-grade insight on pension funds?

Altss delivers:

Principals with verified direct contactsAllocation history by asset classOSINT-derived deal signals
Book a demo

Prefer a guided tour?

We’ll walk you through:

Interactive funding timelinesCustom mandate & allocation filters
Book a demo

More Roslindale Pension Fund profiles