Asset Manager

Updated:

Progress Investment Management Company

Thurman White's Progress Investment runs over $1B for public pensions, using a manager-of-managers model to access emerging and diverse private-market...

Progress Investment Management Company

Progress Investment Management Company was a US-based fund of funds manager founded in 1990. It focused on early-stage and co-investments.

General information

Firm type

Asset Manager

Year founded

1990

AUM

$1B - $5B (Altss estimate)

Location

Region

North America

Country

United States

City

San Francisco

Corporate office

San Francisco, CA, United States

Principals

Thurman V. White Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Sector focus

Private EquityReal EstatePrivate CreditInfrastructure

Frequently asked questions

Who runs investment decisions at Progress Investment Management Company?

Thurman V. White Jr. has led the firm as Chief Executive Officer since its founding in 1990. As a manager-of-managers platform, Progress does not make direct investment decisions on individual company deals — instead, it selects and monitors the underlying fund managers who execute those investments. A dedicated investment committee, supported by a research team, conducts the primary due diligence on each fund before committing client capital.

How does Progress Investment Management source its underlying fund managers?

Progress has spent more than three decades building a proprietary pipeline of emerging and diverse-owned alternative asset managers. The firm sources through a combination of industry relationships, manager conferences, direct outreach and referrals from its large institutional client base, including CalPERS and the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Unlike platform-agnostic allocators, Progress specializes in identifying funds under $1 billion in size where institutional due diligence resources are scarce.

Does Progress Investment Management invest directly, or does it operate as a fund of funds?

Progress operates exclusively as a manager-of-managers, constructing portfolios of underlying private equity, real estate, private credit and infrastructure funds. The firm does not make direct co-investments or operate any proprietary deal-by-deal vehicles. This fund-of-funds structure distinguishes it from direct investors and from generic placement agents that raise capital without exercising ongoing fiduciary oversight.

Which types of institutional clients does Progress Investment Management serve?

Progress primarily serves large US public pension systems that have formal emerging-manager programs mandated by their investment policy statements. CalPERS and the New York State Common Retirement Fund are among the most prominently disclosed relationships. The firm also works with endowments and foundations that seek specialized exposure to smaller, high-conviction private-market funds but lack internal manager-research teams.

What is Progress Investment Management's known posture on diverse and emerging manager mandates?

Progress was founded specifically to address the structural barriers that diverse and emerging managers face when raising institutional capital. The firm's entire platform thesis rests on the view that manager alpha is concentrated in smaller, owner-operated funds that large allocators cannot diligence efficiently. This is not a sideline initiative — it is the core investment philosophy and the reason public pension systems created dedicated mandates for Progress to manage.

How is Progress Investment Management Company structured relative to larger gatekeepers like Hamilton Lane?

Progress is significantly more concentrated in manager selection than multi-asset advisors like Hamilton Lane, which provide a broad range of advisory, reporting and secondary-market services alongside discretionary fund-of-funds management. Progress focuses almost entirely on discretionary emerging-manager portfolios for a concentrated client base, with no significant advisory-only or technology-licensing revenue lines. This narrower focus means Progress's economics are entirely tied to the net performance of its underlying funds.

What geographic regions does Progress Investment Management target through its underlying managers?

The platform has historically concentrated on North American private-market strategies, reflecting the home-market bias of its US public pension clients. However, Progress has committed to underlying managers with exposure to European and Asian markets, particularly in growth equity and infrastructure. The exact geographic mix varies by vintage and is determined by which specialized funds meet Progress's diligence thresholds in a given year.

Profile maintained by using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.

Need institutional-grade insight on asset managers?

Altss delivers:

Principals with verified direct contactsAllocation history by asset classOSINT-derived deal signals
Book a demo

Prefer a guided tour?

We’ll walk you through:

Interactive funding timelinesCustom mandate & allocation filters
Book a demo

More San Francisco Asset Manager profiles