SaaS Ventures

Collin Gutman serves as Managing Partner and appears to set firm-wide investment direction. The Core team operates under General Partner Seth Shuldiner, who manages relationships with hundreds of other VCs. Jesse Bloom leads the Growth practice for Series B through D, while Sian Goldofsky runs the Israel office—each team likely holds decision autonomy within its mandate.

SaaS Ventures operates three dedicated teams: Core targets pre-seed and seed, Growth covers Series B through D, and the Israel team focuses on cybersecurity and AI in the Israeli market. This structure allows stage specialization without losing sector expertise, and gives the firm on-the-ground presence in a critical technology ecosystem outside the United States.

Co-Founder Brian Gaister simultaneously co-founded Pennington Partners & Co., described as a financial entrepreneurship platform. The exact nature of capital flow or shared resources between the two entities is not publicly detailed, but the overlap suggests adjacent deal flow or LP relationships beyond the standalone venture fund.

The firm emphasizes writing first checks before the broader market sees the opportunity, implying willingness to lead or set terms at the earliest stages. Specific lead versus co-investment ratios are not disclosed, though the Growth practice's Series B-D focus suggests participation in larger syndicates alongside later-stage investors.

Coverage spans pre-seed to growth. The Core team leads early-stage work, while the Growth team explicitly targets Series B through D. This range means the firm can support a portfolio company from founding through late-stage private rounds, though it may not participate in every round between.

The Israel team, led by Founding Partner Sian Goldofsky, concentrates on cybersecurity and AI. Israel is one of the most prolific cybersecurity ecosystems outside the US, and the dedicated local presence positions the firm to source deals that might not surface through a US-only network.

SaaS Ventures publicly measures deployment in company count rather than dollar totals—150-plus portfolio companies are cited, but AUM and fund sizes are not disclosed. This makes direct scale comparisons with dollar-focused venture firms difficult, though the portfolio breadth suggests an active, relatively high-volume early-stage strategy.