Updated:
Threadmark
Threadmark, formally the Intermountain Ironworkers Pension Trust, originated in 1964 as a multiemployer defined-benefit plan serving ironworker locals across...
Threadmark
Threadmark, formally the Intermountain Ironworkers Pension Trust, originated in 1964 as a multiemployer defined-benefit plan serving ironworker locals across the Intermountain West. The trust covers active and retired members of Locals 21, 24, 27, 495, and 732, with plan administration handled by CompuSys. Its fiduciary structure reflects the joint labor-management board governance typical of Taft-Hartley plans, where union trustees and contributing employer trustees share oversight — a model that naturally biases the portfolio toward income-producing assets, contractual cash flows, and manager relationships that survive full economic cycles. The plan allocates across a broad private-markets mix: venture capital spanning seed to late-stage, buyout funds, mezzanine debt, distressed and special-situations credit, and fund-of-funds vehicles. The real asset sleeve includes a core real estate portfolio of mixed-use properties and a direct commercial leasehold at 300 Park Avenue in New York, alongside pooled separate accounts and common collective trusts. Threadmark uses strategic joint ventures and separately managed accounts to gain concentrated exposure without the fee drag of oversized fund-of-funds layers. The program is frankly eclectic — a reflection of the board's willingness to let opportunistic credit and niche venture strategies sit alongside the steadier real estate book. Dave Breuner is the partner most closely associated with originating and structuring these investments, particularly around strategic joint ventures and fund placements. The plan's roughly $150 million AUM estimate places it in the lower mid-sized tier of Taft-Hartley plans — large enough to matter to boutiques seeking anchor commitments, small enough to move quickly on off-the-run opportunities. Operations run from Salt Lake City, with no secondary offices; the New York property holding is purely investment, not administrative. What distinguishes Threadmark is its dual identity: it behaves like an institutional pension fund in its fiduciary discipline and liability matching, but sizes and structures commitments like a small family office or endowment — blending direct real estate ownership, pooled vehicles, and manager-level partnerships without the bureaucratic layering common to larger public plans. The multiemployer structure also imposes a natural investment horizon advantage: participant demographics and contribution flows are diversified across five distinct local unions, reducing the sharp liquidity cliffs that plague single-employer plans facing an aging workforce.
General information
Firm type
Pension Fund
Year founded
1964
Location
Region
North America
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
Corporate office
Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Principals
Dave Breuner
Partner
Sector focus
Frequently asked questions
Who runs investment decisions at Threadmark?
Threadmark is governed by a joint board of union trustees from the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers and contributing employer trustees, consistent with Taft-Hartley plan governance. Dave Breuner serves as a key partner on the investment side, focusing on strategic joint ventures, separately managed accounts, and fund placements. The plan administrator, CompuSys, handles recordkeeping and benefits administration but does not direct investment policy.
How does Threadmark source its private-market deals?
Threadmark relies on a mix of general partner relationships built over decades of fund commitments and the direct outreach that comes with being a recognizable labor-affiliated pool of capital. Dave Breuner's role in structuring joint ventures and separate accounts suggests a model that favors negotiated, relationship-driven placements rather than competitive auction processes. The New York real estate position indicates direct sourcing capability in core property markets.
Does Threadmark invest directly or only through funds?
Both. The portfolio includes traditional limited partner commitments to venture, buyout, mezzanine, distressed debt, and fund-of-funds vehicles, but the firm also structures direct co-investments through strategic joint ventures and separately managed accounts. Its core real estate portfolio and commercial leasehold at 300 Park Avenue are direct holdings, demonstrating willingness to commit capital outside a pure fund structure.
What investment stages does Threadmark target in venture?
The venture program spans the full lifecycle: seed-stage, start-up, early-stage, expansion, and late-stage allocations. This breadth typically reflects a commitment to one or more multi-stage venture fund managers rather than bottom-up direct startup investing, though the separate account structure could allow for targeted co-investment at specific stages when a trusted GP offers it.
How is Threadmark connected to the Iron Workers union?
Threadmark is the defined-benefit pension trust for members of Iron Workers Locals 21, 24, 27, 495, and 732, covering workers across the Intermountain region. It is a Taft-Hartley multiemployer plan, meaning contributing employers fund it under collective bargaining agreements, and union representatives sit on the board of trustees alongside employer representatives. The trust provides retirement, disability, and death benefits exclusively to these members.
What does Threadmark's real estate portfolio look like?
The plan holds a core mixed-use real estate portfolio and a commercial office leasehold at 300 Park Avenue on the 2nd floor in Midtown Manhattan. The New York position is notable for a plan of this size — it represents a direct institutional-quality asset typically held by larger allocators. The mixed-use holdings suggest additional exposure to residential, retail, or light industrial properties, likely concentrated in or near the Intermountain West.
Does Threadmark have any known avoidance criteria or negative screens?
No explicit exclusionary policy is publicly disclosed, but Taft-Hartley plans frequently avoid sectors that conflict with union labor priorities — such as non-union heavy construction, anti-union hospitality, or manufacturing with adverse labor records. The distressed debt and special-situations sleeve could theoretically touch contested industries, though any investment that undermines member interests would be politically untenable for labor trustees.
Profile maintained by Altss using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.
Need institutional-grade insight on pension funds?
Altss delivers:
Prefer a guided tour?
We’ll walk you through: