V V P Advisors

Managing Director Venky Ganesan and Managing Partner Scott Kupor share investment authority. Ganesan previously served as a general partner at Globespan Capital Partners and led investments in enterprise infrastructure and cloud companies. Kupor joined after leading corporate development at Hewlett-Packard and later became managing partner and senior advisor at Andreessen Horowitz. The two principals built the firm's crossover strategy together, drawing on Ganesan's growth-stage background and Kupor's mix of operating and public-market expertise.

The firm sources primarily through the deep Silicon Valley networks of its two principals. Kupor's extensive relationships across the venture ecosystem — built during his tenure at Andreessen Horowitz and before that at HP — provide early visibility into fast-growing enterprise companies. Ganesan's Globespan Capital Partners track record and board seats open additional paths to Series C and later rounds that traditional growth funds often miss because of competitive blind spots between venture and growth-stage mandates.

V V P Advisors operates as a crossover investment firm that blends features of both. It launched as a family office vehicle in 2006, managing pooled capital for a concentrated Silcion Valley limited partner base rather than raising institutional blind-pool funds. Over time, the firm adopted a professional investment mandate indistinguishable from a growth-stage venture practice — same check sizes, same board involvement — but retained the single-fund structure and indefinite holding periods characteristic of a permanent capital vehicle.

The firm targets Series C through pre-IPO rounds, typically deploying $10 million to $100 million per position. V V P also holds post-IPO positions in companies it backed privately, creating a continuous exposure model that runs from late-stage private growth through public-market ownership. There is no separate early-stage program or seed vehicle.

The firm invests almost exclusively through direct deals rather than fund-of-fund commitments. It takes board seats or board observer positions in most portfolio companies and manages concentrated positions rather than indexing across dozens of names. The fund commitment model would undermine the structural advantage of indefinite holding periods, which is central to the firm's investment thesis.