Single Family Office

Updated:

Cherry Tree Investments

Cherry Tree Investments runs a deliberately quiet single-family office with a physical presence spanning three of the world's densest innovation corridors...

Cherry Tree Investments

Cherry Tree Investments runs a deliberately quiet single-family office with a physical presence spanning three of the world's densest innovation corridors — Palo Alto, Cambridge and Tel Aviv. The office structure, with additional nodes in San Francisco, Boston and Los Angeles, is atypical for a family office of its apparent scale and signals an operating model built around proximity to deal flow rather than centralized portfolio management. No founding date or wealth-origin narrative has been publicly disclosed, and the office does not maintain a website or LinkedIn presence. Without a public-facing investment mandate, Cherry Tree's strategy is inferred from its geographic footprint. Palo Alto and San Francisco provide access to enterprise software, AI and fintech; Cambridge and Boston anchor it in biotech, therapeutics and MIT/Harvard spinouts; Tel Aviv connects it to cybersecurity and defense-tech. This tri-coastal posture suggests a direct-venture and co-investment strategy that mirrors how top-quartile university endowments deploy — local boots on the ground, no fund-of-funds intermediation. The absence of a New York or London office reinforces the view that Cherry Tree prioritizes origination over secondary-market activity. The office list implies a team distributed across at least six locations, though no headcount, deployment total or named investment professional has ever been cited in the financial press or regulatory filings. The lack of a dedicated London or Asia-Pacific hub suggests the family's wealth base remains US- and Israel-anchored, with venture exposure concentrated in North America and the Mediterranean tech corridor. No philanthropic foundation, club membership or adjacent operating business has been tied to the office in public records. What sets Cherry Tree apart structurally is the combination of a six-office footprint and zero public disclosure. Most family offices of this geographic reach — ICONIQ, Mousse Partners, Willett Advisors — maintain at least a minimal public profile. Cherry Tree's sustained opacity, over what appears to be a multi-year operational history given the depth of its real estate commitment, points to a single-principal structure with no need to market to external LPs or announce exits. The office architecture functions less like an investment firm and more like a proprietary intelligence network embedded in the ZIP codes where the highest-conviction venture deals get done.

General information

Firm type

Single Family Office

Year founded

AUM

Undisclosed

Location

Region

North America

Country

United States

City

Palo Alto

Corporate office

Palo Alto, CA, United States

Additional offices

San Francisco, CA · Cambridge, MA · Los Angeles, CA · Boston, MA · Tel Aviv, Israel

Frequently asked questions

Who runs investment decisions at Cherry Tree Investments?

No named principal or investment committee has been publicly disclosed. The office's distributed six-location footprint and sustained opacity suggest a single-family governance model, likely with a single decision-maker or tight family circle. Cherry Tree has never announced a CIO, managing director or investment partner hire in the financial press, which is consistent with a principal who manages allocations directly rather than through a delegated institutional structure.

Does Cherry Tree participate in fund commitments or only direct deals?

The office has no known fund-of-funds program and no public track record as a limited partner in venture funds. Its physical presence in Palo Alto, Cambridge and Tel Aviv — rather than in traditional LP hubs like New York or London — suggests a preference for direct co-investments and early-stage company exposure accessed through local networks. The model resembles how family offices like Willett Advisors or Mousse Partners operate, favoring direct positions over blind-pool commitments.

What investment stages does Cherry Tree typically target?

Cherry Tree's stage preference cannot be confirmed from public records, but its office locations offer clues. Cambridge anchors the office in pre-seed and seed-stage biotech and university spinouts; Tel Aviv provides exposure to seed and Series A cybersecurity and enterprise software; Palo Alto and San Francisco connect it to Series A through growth-stage venture. The absence of a secondary-market presence or credit team suggests the office avoids late-stage pre-IPO and structured-secondary strategies.

Which sectors does Cherry Tree explicitly avoid?

Cherry Tree has published no negative investment screens or exclusion lists. Based on office geography, the firm likely avoids sectors without cluster proximity — natural resources, heavy industrials, consumer packaged goods and traditional energy infrastructure. The absence of a London office makes European fintech and enterprise software less accessible; the absence of a Singapore or Hong Kong office makes Southeast Asian venture unlikely absent third-party introductions.

Where does the underlying wealth come from?

The source of Cherry Tree's capital has never been disclosed. The office's deep roots in Palo Alto and Cambridge date its presence to at least the last venture cycle, and the sustained six-office commitment implies liquid wealth — likely a technology or life-sciences liquidity event from a founder or early executive. No industry publication has linked the office to a named fortune, making its wealth origin one of the tighter informational moats among US single-family offices.

Does Cherry Tree maintain philanthropic structures, and how are they separated?

No charitable foundation, donor-advised fund or philanthropic LLC has been tied to Cherry Tree Investments in public filings or IRS records. This does not rule out philanthropy executed through personal channels, but the absence of a named foundation distinguishes Cherry Tree from peers like CZI or Omidyar Network that pair investment offices with parallel philanthropic entities. Any charitable activity appears to fall below the mandatory disclosure threshold.

How does Cherry Tree source proprietary deal flow?

Cherry Tree's deal flow likely derives from its geographic embedding. Offices in Palo Alto, Cambridge and Tel Aviv place the firm within walking distance of venture partners at a16z, Sequoia, Bessemer and Pitango, as well as the technology transfer offices at Stanford, MIT and the Weizmann Institute. This local-presence model creates an informational advantage that substitutes for the GP-relationship networks that multi-family offices typically buy into via fund commitments.

Profile maintained by using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.

Need institutional-grade insight on family offices?

Altss delivers:

Principals with verified direct contactsAllocation history by asset classOSINT-derived deal signals
Book a demo

Prefer a guided tour?

We’ll walk you through:

Interactive funding timelinesCustom mandate & allocation filters
Book a demo