Updated:
FOE Investment
FOE Investment was founded in Vienna by Benjamin Ruschin and Tom Urbanek, who anchor a five-partner group that includes Peter Steinberger, Larissa...
FOE Investment
FOE Investment was founded in Vienna by Benjamin Ruschin and Tom Urbanek, who anchor a five-partner group that includes Peter Steinberger, Larissa Kravitz, and Kambis Kohansal Vajargah. The partnership structure draws on operational credibility—Steinberger recently joined OpenAI to lead personal agents, while Kohansal Vajargah heads startup services at the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber—rather than inherited wealth or institutional fundraising. The firm's posture is active and capital-light, aligning more with a founder-operated investment syndicate than a traditional venture fund. The firm focuses on seed and early-stage technology investments, with particular emphasis on enterprise software, AI/ML, fintech, digital health, and climate tech. Co-investment partners and confirmed portfolio names are not publicly disclosed in detail, but the firm's network—including Tom Urbanek's parallel real estate portfolio across Austria and Germany and the Immo Invest Club Austria he founded—provides adjacent deal-sourcing channels. Geographic priority is the DACH region, with opportunistic exposure to broader European early-stage rounds. Team scale is deliberately lean. No total AUM or deployment figure is published, and the firm does not operate a multi-billion-euro fund structure. Adjacent vehicles include Big Cheese Ventures in Vienna and TAURUS Sicherheitstechnik, an operating business. Board affiliations extend the firm's reach: Benjamin Ruschin serves on the board of Invest Austria, and both Ruschin and Kohansal Vajargah are recognized as Digital Leaders by the World Economic Forum—a signal of policy-adjacent influence that shapes deal origination. The structural differentiator is the partnership's dual-operator density. Few Central European early-stage vehicles embed a partner inside OpenAI's product leadership while another chairs a federal startup-services unit. That configuration gives FOE a sourcing model that blends regulatory visibility, technical talent access, and a real-asset co-investor network—without a formal fund-cycle constraint. The risk is reliance on individual partner bandwidth rather than an institutionalized investment committee, making succession and mandate continuity the central governance question for co-investors evaluating the platform.
General information
Firm type
Generalist
Year founded
—
AUM
Undisclosed
Location
Region
Europe
Country
Austria
City
Vienna
Corporate office
Vienna, Austria
Principals
Benjamin Ruschin
Managing Partner and Co-Founder
Tom Urbanek
Managing Partner and Co-Founder
Peter Steinberger
Co-Founder
Larissa Kravitz
Co-Founder
Kambis Kohansal Vajargah
Co-Founder
Sector focus
Frequently asked questions
Who runs investment decisions at FOE Investment?
Managing Partners Benjamin Ruschin and Tom Urbanek lead the investment process. They operate within a five-person co-founder structure that includes Peter Steinberger, Larissa Kravitz, and Kambis Kohansal Vajargah. The group does not publicly separate an independent investment committee from the general partner, consistent with a syndicate model where partner consensus drives allocation.
How does FOE Investment source proprietary deal flow?
Deal flow combines several distinct channels. Kambis Kohansal Vajargah's role as Head of Startup Services at the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber provides direct access to early-stage companies across Austria. Peter Steinberger's product-leadership position at OpenAI connects the firm to elite technical networks. Benjamin Ruschin's board seat at Invest Austria and the partners' World Economic Forum Digital Leader status add policy and corporate introductions. Tom Urbanek's real estate network across Austria and Germany offers a parallel set of entrepreneur relationships outside the venture ecosystem.
Is FOE Investment structured as a fund or an investing syndicate?
FOE Investment operates more like a partner-run investing syndicate than a traditional venture fund. No publicly disclosed fund vehicle or AUM figure exists. The firm deploys its own capital through a co-founder vehicle rather than a blind-pool fund with external limited partners and fixed fee-and-carry terms. This allows indefinite holding periods and avoids fund-cycle deployment pressure.
What investment stages does FOE Investment target?
FOE targets pre-seed, seed, and early start-up rounds, with a likely check-size range typical of Central European pre-institutional rounds. The firm's emphasis is on first institutional capital or operator-led early rounds rather than Series A+ growth-stage mandates. Specific round sizes and ownership targets are not publicly disclosed.
How does FOE Investment's real estate activity relate to the venture portfolio?
Tom Urbanek maintains a separate residential real estate portfolio across Austria and Germany and founded the Immo Invest Club Austria for real estate investors. These activities are not merged into the venture portfolio but provide co-investor relationships and capital that sit adjacent to the early-stage technology practice. There is no indication the firm blends asset classes within a single vehicle.
What is FOE Investment's known posture on co-investments alongside external GPs?
The firm's syndicate model suggests co-investment with external lead investors is central to its approach rather than reserved for select cases. Co-founders like Kambis Kohansal Vajargah and Peter Steinberger sit inside institutions that generate deal flow for their primary employers and personal networks alike, favoring a collaborative rather than lead-check orientation. However, specific co-investment track records with named GPs are not public.
What governance or succession risks apply to FOE Investment's partnership model?
The firm's investment mandate depends heavily on five individual partners, each with primary commitments outside the investment vehicle—most visibly Peter Steinberger's role at OpenAI. No publicly disclosed succession plan or institutionalized investment committee exists. For co-investors evaluating a long-term commitment, the key question is whether the platform would survive the departure of one or more key partners without losing its sourcing advantage.
Profile maintained by Altss using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.
Need institutional-grade insight on asset managers?
Altss delivers:
Prefer a guided tour?
We’ll walk you through: