Updated:
Paloma Partners Management Company (PPMC)
Donald Sussman's Paloma Partners pioneered the hedge fund seeding model in 1981, backing D.E. Shaw, Farallon, and Level Global before they scaled.
Paloma Partners Management Company (PPMC)
Donald Sussman established Paloma Partners Management Company in Greenwich, Connecticut in 1981. The firm emerged during the formative years of the hedge fund industry as an early allocator that provided not just capital but institutional credibility to newly launching managers. Sussman, a lawyer by training who transitioned into trading and investment management, positioned the firm as a multi-strategy fund of funds that could evaluate and combine uncorrelated trading strategies across a growing universe of alternative managers. Paloma's strategy centers on allocating to external hedge fund managers across equity long/short, global macro, relative value, and event-driven strategies. The firm has historically concentrated on seeding emerging managers — providing initial capital and operational support in exchange for fee advantages and capacity rights. Among its most notable seedings, Paloma backed D.E. Shaw & Co. in 1988 with $28 million, a partnership that produced extraordinary returns over subsequent decades. The firm also provided early backing to Farallon Capital Management, founded by Tom Steyer in 1986, and to Level Global Investors, launched by David Ganek and Anthony Chiasson in 2003. The firm's geographic focus spans the United States, Europe, and select Asian markets where manager talent density is highest. As of the mid-2010s, Paloma managed an estimated $10 billion to $20 billion in capital, making it one of the larger independent allocators to hedge fund strategies globally. The firm operates from Greenwich, Connecticut. In recent years, Paloma has expanded its mandate from pure hedge fund allocation into adjacent credit and special situations strategies, reflecting the broader industry shift toward hybrid structures that blend liquid alternatives with private credit exposure. William Michaelcheck, a long-time partner and co-founder of Mariner Investment Group, served as Chairman of Paloma through the 2010s, adding institutional governance depth to the investment function. Paloma's structural differentiator lies in its seeding model. By providing early anchor capital to managers — often before they have a track record or institutional infrastructure — Paloma gains privileged access to capacity and fee structures that later investors cannot replicate. This early-mover posture in manager selection, sustained across four decades, creates a portfolio architecture built on relationships rather than purely quantitative screening. Sussman's continued leadership as founder-CIO, with no external parent or public-market governance constraints, allows the firm to maintain long-duration manager commitments without the redemption-cycle pressures faced by many institutional funds of funds.
General information
Firm type
Multi Family Office
Year founded
1981
AUM
$10B - $20B (Altss estimate)
Location
Region
North America
Country
United States
City
Greenwich
Corporate office
Greenwich, CT, United States
Principals
Donald Sussman
Founder and Chief Investment Officer
William Michaelcheck
Chairman
Sector focus
Frequently asked questions
How did Paloma Partners seed D.E. Shaw, and why was that investment significant?
Paloma Partners provided $28 million in seed capital to D.E. Shaw & Co. when it launched in 1988, at a time when quantitative investing was virtually unknown as an institutional strategy. The investment gave Paloma preferential fee terms and capacity rights that compounded as D.E. Shaw grew into one of the largest and most sophisticated quantitative hedge funds globally, managing over $60 billion. This seeding exemplified Paloma's core model of identifying non-consensus manager talent early and locking in structural advantages that later investors could not access.
Who makes investment decisions at Paloma Partners?
Donald Sussman, the founder, serves as Chief Investment Officer and has led the firm's manager selection and portfolio construction since 1981. William Michaelcheck served as Chairman through the 2010s, providing additional governance and investment committee oversight. The firm's decision-making structure is flat and founder-led, with no external parent company or public shareholders imposing allocation mandates or liquidity requirements on the portfolio.
Does Paloma allocate to private markets, or is it strictly a hedge fund allocator?
Historically, Paloma concentrated exclusively on hedge fund strategies across long/short equity, macro, relative value, and event-driven mandates. In the last decade, the firm has expanded into private credit and special situations, reflecting the broader convergence of hedge fund and private capital strategies. Paloma remains predominantly a liquid-alternatives allocator, but its mandate now includes hybrid structures that blend public-market trading with private origination.
What is Paloma's approach to manager concentration and portfolio construction?
Paloma typically maintains a concentrated roster of 20 to 40 external managers, with larger allocations to seeded relationships where the firm holds preferential terms. The portfolio construction emphasizes strategy diversification across uncorrelated return drivers — a manager trading European credit, for example, would be combined with a global macro manager and an equity market-neutral manager to reduce drawdown correlation. The firm avoids index-hugging hedge fund replication and instead targets idiosyncratic alpha from managers it knows at an operational level.
How does Paloma structure its fees with underlying managers?
As a seeder and early anchor investor, Paloma historically negotiates below-market management fees and performance fee discounts from the managers it backs — occasionally securing founder-share-class economics or revenue-sharing arrangements on the manager's own fee income. These terms are not publicly disclosed in detail, but early seeding relationships with firms like D.E. Shaw and Farallon were structured to give Paloma economic advantages that compounded as those managers scaled their assets.
Profile maintained by Altss using OSINT (open-source intelligence), regulatory filings, licensed data partners, and verified direct submissions. Read the methodology. Last updated: . Continuous refresh with full update cycles at least every 30 days.
Need institutional-grade insight on family offices?
Altss delivers:
Prefer a guided tour?
We’ll walk you through: